Plain Dealer Browns beat writer Tony Grossi answers readers questions.
Plain Dealer file photoDon't expect to see fullback Lawrence Vickers getting a shot at playing linebacker for the Browns.
Q: Hey, Tony: Do you think the Browns have a good chance to finish their season 7-9 or higher? -- Malek Abumeri, Cleveland
A: Hey, Malek: Let's reserve our predictions until free agency has run its course. The roster is incomplete, to say the least.
Q: Hey, Tony: If players after four years will be "unrestricted" free agents with the new CBA, who on the Browns qualify for this? -- Ken Dobrowolski, Cincinnati
A: Hey, Ken: Eric Wright, Lawrence Vickers, Matt Roth, Billy Yates, Floyd Womack, Chansi Stuckey, Abe Elam, Jason Trusnik.
Q: Hey, Tony: With a glaring need for veteran WR support, I read recently that the Jags' Mike Sims-Walker would fall under the proposed four-year free agent plan. Prior to the lockout, the team told Sims-Walker that "they'd be going another direction." Do you see him as someone we would be interested in? -- Travis Foshe, Phoenix
A: Hey, Travis: I don't see the Browns making a move on any receiver in free agency. They already have a cast of thousands at the position and have consistently expressed confidence in the receivers on their roster.
Q: Hey, Tony: In 2007, the last time the AFC Central played the NFC West, the Browns played at Arizona and home to Seattle. Why do they play at Arizona and home to Seattle again in 2011? Doesn't the NFL alternate as part of the scheduling rotation? -- Brent Silver, Orange Village
A: Hey, Brent: The league stopped automatically alternating home sites in interconference games a few years ago to accommodate Western-based teams, which always lead in travel miles. So there is nothing to guarantee unfamiliar NFC foes play in Cleveland at least once every eight years.
Q: Hey, Tony: Any thoughts on whether Randy Lerner and the Browns are one of the small-market teams holding back from agreeing on the CBA? An article on Yahoo indicates the Browns would be forced to spend a lot more than they have been under the new CBA with a cap floor.-- Ben Williamson, Fairfield , Conn.
A: Hey, Ben: The Browns are not going to stick out their necks and hold up any CBA deal. They may be considered "small market," but they are owned by a multibillionaire.
Q: Hey, Tony: Back in the '80s before we could research anything on the Internet, my dad, siblings, and I kept up with the Brownies via a newspaper/newsletter. It recapped that week's game, looked ahead to the next week, and the middle had a full poster of a player that we used to decorate our rooms with (my siblings and I had to pick a number for who got to keep it). It was delivered from Ohio to N.Y. about midweek and came on a weekly basis. My question is, do you know/remember the name of this newspaper/newsletter? Hope you can help this burning question in my mind. -- Rebecca Pratt, Northville, N.Y.
A: Hey, Rebecca: You're thinking of Browns News/Illustrated, a fine publication formerly produced by former Akron Beacon Journal beat writer Ray Yannucci. BNI was one of the innocent victims of the loss of football for three seasons as a result of Art Modell's move to Baltimore. The paper took a beating while trying to publish without a team.
Q: Hey, Tony: My question is about the supplemental draft. Assuming that it does take place, do the Browns get to take any of Atlanta's turns? We have their first- and fourth-round picks next year and when you take a player in this draft, you forfeit next year's corresponding draft pick. So, since the Falcons don't have those rounds, do we get to take their place? -- Nick Snyder, Atlanta
A: Hey, Nick: I submitted this question to an NFL official. Here was the response: Clubs are reminded that the priority does not reflect the actual order of each round, which may be affected by previously completed trades involving 2011 draft choices. Clubs are also reminded that choices to which they do not own clear title may not be exercised in the Supplemental Draft. Clubs who own clear title to an additional selection choice in a round must specify which selection choice they are exercising.
Q: Hey, Tony: Since the Browns drafted fullback/linebacker Owen Marecic to replace Lawrence Vickers at fullback, any chance the Browns might see if Vickers can play linebacker? If Marecic can go both ways, why not see if Vickers can too? -- Mike Mucha, Marion, Va.
A: Hey, Mike: Surely you jest.
Q: Hey, Tony: This may be a moot question if a new CBA is reached soon, but have the players considered hiring a former coach to work with them at their workout sessions? I would think it would be valuable to bring in someone like Jon Gruden or Steve Mariucci to a "Camp Colt" session for a few days to help get the players more familiar with the West Coast offense. -- Chris Michlik, Toronto
A: Hey, Chris: It's a nice thought, but if the owners don't care whether their players are prepared for the 2011 season -- they've locked them out -- why should the players care?
Q: Hey, Tony: How involved has Randy Lerner been during this whole CBA thing? Does Mike Holmgren just take his place? Where does Randy Lerner stand? I hear a lot of owners names but never Lerner, does he even care about his money? -- Dan Desai, Toledo
A: Hey, Dan: Lerner is not that active in NFL league affairs. To some extent, that's why he's paying Holmgren so much to represent him at league meetings. Lerner and Holmgren both attended the most recent owners meeting.
Q: Hey, Tony: The lockout might be lifted soon. Do you see them losing some preseason games? If so, do you think that will make a big difference? -- Johnny D'ambrosia, Garfield Heights
A: Hey, Johnny: The owners don't want to lose preseason games because they are such a nice source of revenue. My educated guess is that a preseason game or two might be lost because of a protracted lockout. Will it make a big difference? The loss of the off-season will matter more to teams with new coaches, like the Browns.
Q: Hey, Tony: I'm worried about the injury rumor about Phil Taylor's toes and that it's something he has to play with because the condition is inoperable. That's not good considering he's 337 pounds. Did you hear anything about that? -- Thaddeus Landers, Youngstown
A: Hey, Thaddeus: In interviews after the draft, Taylor said reports of an unusual foot condition were not true. We shall see.
Q: Hey, Tony: Tell the Browns to check into a practice-squad player, Adrian Arrington, at New Orleans. He'll be a great pickup for the Browns. He's a beast of a receiver. -- Fred Gibson, Georgetown, Texas
A: Hey, Fred: Would Browns fans accept another receiver from Michigan?
Q: Hey, Tony: Why do you think the Camp Colt sessions are so worthless? Isn't the West Coast offense highly predicated on having great timing between your quarterback and receivers? Aren't these camps allowing Colt to do just that with his receiving corps? I think it's time we gave Colt the credit he is due for going out of his way to organize these highly productive and extremely valuable practice sessions. -- Art Core, New York,
A: Hey, Art: McCoy should be commended for taking charge of the offense. But, in truth, most of the quarterbacks are doing the same thing. It's part of the job description and why they get the big bucks.
Q: Hey, Tony: A lot of people are calling for the Browns to pick up Terrelle Pryor in the supplemental draft and justify it by saying he could be moved to WR if he doesn't develop as a QB in the NFL. I know Josh Cribbs was a QB in college but one could hardly make a case that he's a great NFL WR. He's really just a great KR. Are there really any good examples of college QBs turned great NFL WRs? -- John Arend, Enid, Okla.
A: Hey, John: I can't think of two athletes more opposite than Cribbs and Pryor. One worked hard for everything he earned (Cribbs) and the other felt entitled to everything he was given (Pryor). I wouldn't fathom Pryor putting in the hard work required of a position switch at this point of his career. There aren't a lot of college QBs who turned into great NFL WRs. Other than Cribbs, the best current example would be Brad Smith of the Jets, who, like Cribbs, is more of a specialist than a bona fide wide receiver.
Q: Hey, Tony: The Cleveland Browns gave up several of the traditions from the era when the teams were very good. Over the last several years they brought back the true mascot "Brownie the Elf" but they didn't bring back the Browns theme music which was always played before and during the games. Question is, why, when it was a fan favorite? -- Robert Arthur, Shaker Heights
A: Hey, Robert: I don't know the answer. I do know that since the Browns were reborn in expansion, the new organization has struggled to balance old traditions with new, modern innovations. There has been no guidebook for them to follow and the lack of a constant voice and conscience in the organization has hurt them on these matters.
Q: Hey, Tony: Tom Heckert has come out recently and said the Browns won't be active in free agency when it resumes. My question is, why not? Is there a salary cap issue? Only four out of our 12 first-round draft selections (since they returned in 1999) will be on the roster. We've already parted ways with several veterans, and probably won't re-sign several other key starters. . . . So after Thomas, Mack, Haden, & Taylor, who's making the "big money" around here this coming season? Is there a Pro Bowler in the bunch? -- Sean McNabb, Berea
A: Hey, Sean: This is not really a money issue. Free agency is best utilized when a team needs one or two players to put it over the top, or a couple to fill prominent roles. Teams that lean on free agency too heavily historically have failed miserably (e.g. Washington). Heckert's experience with the Eagles taught him that winning teams are built through the draft and free agency is no panacea.
Q: Hey, Tony: Do you see the Browns making any selections during the 2011 NFL Supplemental Draft? Maybe CB Janoris Jenkins, Florida? -- Nate Workman, Cincinnati
A: Hey, Nate: Jenkins has enrolled in another university and will not be in the supplemental draft. I don't expect the Browns to participate.
Q: Hey, Tony: I could care less what info you report, you assumed Matt Roth didn't like playing for Eric Mangini and your assumption was wrong. -- Mike B, Dover
A: Hey, Mike: Players sometimes state opinions for public consumption that differ, if not contradict, opinions they've stated in private.
Q: Hey, Tony: For the sake of discussion, let's say that by mid August, the temperament of NFL owner and player negotiators truly worsens. Is there any truth to the rumor that the TV networks have approached the NCAA with a Plan C to get them to reschedule and expand the number of televised college games to cover Saturdays & Sundays along with special games for Monday Night Football? -- Alan Fojt, Manassas, Va.
A: Hey, Alan: If the NFL doesn't have a 2011 season, I would expect college football to do everything to fill the void.
Q: Hey, Tony: Do you think Colt McCoy is the franchise QB of the Browns? I agree with you that the elite teams have a franchise QB in place. Colt seems like a bright kid, but does he have enough tools (arm strength, can he stay healthy) to lead the Browns to the "promised land" (Super Bowl)? I'm tired of these arrogant Squeeler fans (they do win). The city of Cleveland needs a championship. Should we apologize to the Brown family (Paul Brown) for what Modell did to him (hahaha) to break "the curse"? I and Cleveland fans want a winner in our lifetime! -- Thaddeus Landers, Youngstown
A: Hey, Thaddeus: Lots to chew on here. 1. My feeling on McCoy is that we will know by the end of this year if he is "the guy." He was thrust in ahead of his time last year in an offensive system that was not quarterback-friendly. Now, in his second year, he has the support system in place to bring out the best in him. We will know by season's end if he has "it." I can't quantify "it" in terms of wins and losses. But we will know it when we see it. 2. The Steelers have one of the top three organizations in the NFL and their fans know it. Deal with it. 3. The "curse" can only be lifted by an elite quarterback who beats the Steelers and Ravens and takes this team deep into the playoffs. Tom Brady, Peyton Manning and Drew Brees broke their franchise's "curses."
Q: Hey, Tony: You remember the beginning of free agency periods when deals were announced a short time after midnight? Obviously the deals were made days or weeks before. Do you think that some teams have made some wink and nod deals with unrestricted free agents and that signings will come quickly after a new contract agreement is reached? -- Ray DuMont, Foley, Ala.
A: Hey, Ray: As soon as free agency gets the green light, I would expect signings to occur immediately. Twenty signings in the first 24 hours, 100 or so in the first week.
Q: Hey, Tony: C'mon, you can tell the truth about the real hangup in the NFL negotiations with the players. The real sticking point is Jerry Jones' demand that he be shown on TV six times per quarter and the players sticking to the mandatory three times required by the old contract. Do you think they can get over this hump so that we can have a season? -- John Hruby, Poland, Ohio
A: Hey, John: I think having a season is now possible. I was thinking otherwise a month ago.
Q: Hey, Tony: When do you think this thing will be over? -- Mike Love, Merritt Island, Fla.
A: Hey, Mike: Never have we longed for a training camp more than this year.
Q: Hey, Tony: When Bill Belichick cited Bernie Kosar's "diminishing skills" for his reason in cutting him, did you agree with Bill? In regards to his skills being in serious decline, and the decision to cut him? I've been reading your stuff for years, but am not certain I ever saw your take this on. -- Joshua Jones, Fullerton, Calif.
A: Hey, Joshua: I thought it was appalling that the situation came to Belichick cutting Kosar. Surely his skills were declining. But to cut a player of his stature in the middle of the season -- with the team at 5-3 -- was uncommonly stupid. What happened was the unfortunate confluence of a young, inexperienced head coach failing to resolve his differences with a hard-headed, immensely popular player in decline. They butted heads and egos. The coach felt his authority was threatened. The player felt he was being marginalized by the coach and his top assistant, Mike Lombardi, and his career was being systematically destroyed. Both the coach and player could have reacted better, but they were caught in the emotions of the moment. The situation begged for a strong owner -- or general manager -- to intercede and defuse the bomb. It didn't happen.
Q: Hey, Tony: I'm watching a NFL Network show where they're discussing the relationship between the media and players and coaches. In it they mention that Herm Edwards once had a mini-camp for reporters to help educate them on what really is involved in the game. Considering that we have a lockout and that Pat Shurmur is a first-time head coach, do you think it would be a good idea for him to have such a camp? It would help him build relationships with the media and also might slightly, very slightly, kind of dry run some of the stuff he'll do with real players later. My other question is how well do you think current coaches in the modern NFL understand that reporters are representing the fans? -- Glenn Studevant, Tucson, Ariz.
A: Hey, Glenn: The Browns and the NFL have been on hiatus since March, yet the team never had a formal meet-and-greet with the media or any other introduction of their new coaches, other than Shurmur. So what does that tell you? Do I think current coaches in the modern NFL understand that reporters are representing the fans? Some do. But to be honest, I have not seen that to be the case here on a consistent basis.
-- Tony