Ohio State appears to be back on track, following a 1-5 slide by beating two ranked teams on the road. But as the Buckeyes get ready to host Purdue on Saturday, it's worth remembering even their bad isn't so bad.
Watch video
COLUMBUS, Ohio – The Buckeyes feel like they are back from the brink, after phrases like “rock bottom” were thrown around during a 1-5 slide that turned around with road wins at Wisconsin and Iowa in the last week.
“The mood is way better,” forward LaQuinton Ross said Friday. “The gym, we go into the weight room the mood is better, the locker room everybody is laughing now. A week ago you come in there and everyone is like sad in there. You can almost put on some gloomy music in there.
“But winning cures all.”
That, of course, is always true in sports. So the Ohio State team (18-5, 5-5 Big Ten) that will host Purdue (14-9, 4-6) on Saturday has been reborn. What the Buckeyes and their fans may not understand now, as things tick up -- “Right now I think it’s looking good for us,” Ross said -- is how far removed this really is from rock bottom. And how far removed the Buckeyes have been from a true rebuilding year for so long, and how rare that is.
Over the last four years, Ohio State has been one of the three best regular-season teams in college basketball. That’s judged on seeding in the NCAA Tournament, which is nothing more than a numerical evaluation against the rest of the nation of how your regular season went. Judging only teams that have made each of the last four NCAA Tournaments, and assigning a sum based on adding up a program’s seed each year, only Kansas and Duke have been better than the Buckeyes.
Team, Total (Seed by year '13, '12, '11, '10)
1. Kansas, 5 (1,2,1,1)
2. Duke, 6 (2,2,1,1)
3. Ohio State, 7 (2,2,1,2)
4. Syracuse, 9 (4,1,3,1)
5. Georgetown, 14 (2,3,6,3)
6. Wisconsin, 17 (5,4,4,4)
7. Louisville, 18 (1,4,4,9)
8. Michigan State, 19 (3, 1, 10, 5)
9. Kansas State, 19 (4,8,5,2)
10. Florida, 22 (3,7,2,10)
Ohio State, which has plunged from No. 3 in the rankings to out of the AP poll, has problems. Some good Ohio kids are playing elsewhere. A shooter that would have helped transferred. The big men can still be inconsistent, though they are playing better lately.
But there are problems everywhere. The Buckeyes are one of four programs, along with Kansas, Duke and Syracuse, to earn a top four seed in the NCAA Tournament for four straight years.
The home loss to last-place Penn State on Jan. 29, the worst loss of Thad Matta's 10 years in Columbus, followed the road loss Jan. 20 at Nebraska which at that time was arguably Matta's worst loss. But rock bottom is so much worse than 18-5 and 5-5. The Buckeyes aren’t out of the woods, though they’ll play five of their final eight regular-season games at home, and the three road games (Illinois, Penn State, Indiana) are against teams in the bottom half of the Big Ten.
"The fact you won two games on the road and you're coming
home I know means absolutely nothing if you aren't ready to play at the level
you need to play at," Matta said.
He needs to say things like that because there are no guarantees with this team, which can make scoring seem so difficult. But when a potential 3-7 Big Ten record was staring them in the face, they responded.
"I think people are just tired of losing, so in those
situations we had a lot of people step up," Ross said of the last moments at
Wisconsin and Iowa. "I think it was just a combination of guys not accepting
losing anymore and guys stepping up to the plate."
Frankly, the Buckeyes are probably overdue for a stepback season, the kind that struck Kentucky last season, when the Wildcats, a year removed from a national title, missed the NCAA Tournament and lost in the first round of the NIT. It was quite a cautionary tale to any program and fan base that might think itself impervious to the possibility of falling off a cliff for a year.
“If you look at that Kentucky team, that was like a whole new group of guys that came in,” Ross said.
OSU guard Shannon Scott pointed out that young Kentucky team was for the most part new to real problems, and when it hit some bumps, the players didn’t seem to know what to do.
Ross said chemistry and toughness is what helps avoid big stepback seasons like that. For a team with two seniors and four juniors among its top six players, maybe it was a surprise that a 1-5 skid came along at all. But if it happens, that’s the kind of group you want when trying to pull out of it.
“We’ve all been through highs and lows here,” Scott said.
But not that low. Asked how often in his previous nine years he reached the end of the season and thought his team, overall, was really not as good as it could have been, Matta paused. This wasn't talking about February bumps, or an Elite Eight loss to Wichita State last season, or the blown chance in the Final Four against Kansas in 2012, or the 2011 team as a No. 1 seed shooting itself out of the tournament in the Sweet 16 against Kentucky.
This was about stepback years.
"I would say I've been pretty satisfied with what we've
gotten out of each team," Matta said. "In '08, I didn't like how that team progressed
through (the season) – it was more of a mindset, I think, just immaturity.
But for those guys to finish the way they did and win the NIT was kind of like,
'Wow, that was pretty good.'"
That was the only season in Matta's OSU career when he had a
team eligible for the NCAA Tournament and didn't make it. For a while last
week, it was the comparison for this team.
Ohio State is probably due for that kind of team. Even if the Buckeyes beat Purdue and string some wins together to end the regular season, they almost certainly aren't going to win the Big Ten. They almost certainly aren't going to be a top-two seed in the NCAA Tournament again.
But that would just make them like almost every other team in the nation when it comes to navigating a long season from year-to-year. Recently, in that regard, Ohio State has been one of the best.