The NCAA sounds like it wants to get more serious about violations, but Ohio State's hearing before the Committee on Infractions today should be decided by the facts at hand.
COLUMBUS, Ohio — Reform will be in the air as Ohio State's seven-person athletic department contingent enters an Indianapolis hotel conference this morning for the school's hearing before the NCAA's Committee on Infractions. During a two-day summit this week, also in Indianapolis, more than 60 NCAA leaders talked about changing the face of college athletics, with "integrity" one of their primary focuses.
It sounds like it might not be a great time for Ohio State and former coach Jim Tressel to be ready to face their punishments.
But when the door closes around 8:30 a.m. and the hearing begins, what's in the air shouldn't matter. The 10-member committee will decide Ohio State's sanctions based on the evidence the NCAA enforcement staff provided and the words of the OSU administrators.
"You focus on the record and the people in front of you," a former committee member said. "You do not have in mind outside agendas or talk about summits or even media reports. You build a box around your head and keep that stuff out."
"You don't go into a hearing weekend thinking, 'Oh, we're going to get them this time,' " said former committee member Andrea Myers, the retired athletic director at Indiana State. "I didn't ever intentionally think about any outside things or what was going on nationally. I can't tell you nothing ever affected me, but if it did, it wasn't by choice."
Ohio State, led by President Gordon Gee, Athletic Director Gene Smith and current football coach Luke Fickell, will attempt to convince the committee that the penalties the school self-imposed in July should be enough -- two years of probation and the vacating of the 2010 Big Ten title season. Tressel will admit to his unethical conduct violations, for not divulging his knowledge of players selling memorabilia and autographs, and attempt to avoid a show-cause penalty that would make it more difficult for him to take another coaching job in the near future, if he so desires.
After a hearing, the committee, made up of conference commissioners, university faculty members and independent attorneys, typically meets through the weekend as a group, going over the case and making final assessments. So by Monday, Ohio State's fate should be decided.
But it won't be known for about six weeks, as a committee member is assigned to write the report, which other members then examine and edit before it is released.
Certainly, Ohio State could face additional penalties when that final decision is announced. But given the nature of the allegations, and the precedent of previous cases, a bowl ban is unlikely though a reduction of some scholarships is possible.
What this hearing should not do is serve as the NCAA's moment to draw a line in the sand and say enough is enough. The NCAA summit, which included 50 university presidents, talked about implementing uniform, and more serious penalties for certain charges. But that hasn't happened yet.
Ohio State has a popular, wealthy football program that committed serious violations, but don't expect Ohio State to be used as an example to let the rest of the NCAA know that the system in changing.
"Facts are stubborn things," Big Ten Commissioner Jim Delany, himself a former enforcement staff member, said at the league meetings last month. "They're more malleable for some people, but in the court, an administrative hearing, facts matter, findings matter.
"Generally speaking, the outcomes that the committee gives are rational on that day. They hear evidence. They look at prior cases. . . . I don't fear that the infractions committee is going to be any more difficult this summer than they were last summer or the summer before."
In looking at recent cases, the committee will find five instances in the past 10 years in which major college football programs were given postseason bans of one or two years. In three instances, the schools were hit with a lack of institutional control charge, an indictment of an entire program that schools want to avoid. Ohio State was not labeled with that charge by the enforcement staff, though the committee has the right to add that. In the other two instances, the schools were charged with major recruiting violations that angered the committee because of their severity.
Though Tressel's cover-up is serious business, the infractions that started this case, the players and the tattoo parlor, are not as major.
There is plenty to consider, though. Myers said she typically spent three or four weekends preparing for a case, reading all the evidence at hand. For a case like Ohio State's, she said probably boxes of information, with the documents in the thousands, were provided to committee members.
That's a lot to consider. It doesn't leave much room for checking which way the winds of reform might be blowing.