Time for another trip though Tony Grossi's mailbag.
Chuck Crow / The Plain DealerWill Pat Shurmur last long enough with the Browns to the be only head coach on the team's payroll? Hey, Tony: This year's draft class looks pretty weak overall. Your thoughts? -- Paul Kebker, Slippery Rock, Pa.
Hey, Paul: If that were the case, I would expect the expert draft teams like the Steelers, Packers, Patriots, etc., to get richer and the also-rans to get poorer.
Hey, Tony: I suppose it doesn't really matter to me, since it's not my money, but a small part of me hopes that Pat Shurmur stays head coach long enough that the Browns are only paying for one head coach instead of three. How long will that take? -- Stan Himes, West Des Moines, Iowa
Hey, Stan: Three years.
Hey, Tony: With Shurmur's past experience as QB coach and offensive coordinator, how much will he actually be involved in the development of Colt McCoy and the offensive philosophy? And what, if any, input will Mike Holmgren have on this? Also, one of my complaints against Eric Mangini was what I considered poor personnel choices (like sitting your No. 1 draft choice while Eric Wright was getting torched or throwing the ball to stone-fingers Robert Royal). Does anything in Shurmur's history indict him for similar issues? -- Ken Knapp, Hallandale Beach, Fla.
Hey, Ken: Shurmur's high priorities will be to establish the offensive philosophy and develop McCoy. I'm sure Holmgren will take a more active role alongside Shurmur than he took with Mangini. There's no record on Shurmur as a head coach making personnel decisions or game decisions. Coordinators often have to defer to the head coach on critical game decisions, so we won't know how he'll fare until he's totally in charge.
Hey, Tony: Isn't the West Coast Offense an update on the offense Paul Brown ran with the Browns (i.e., quick passing routes, mobile QB, and power running game)? And a completely random question: What is the purpose of the two-minute warning? Provide an extra commercial timeout? Allow teams to strategize in the last 120 seconds? -- Jim Albertson, Norman, Okla.
Hey, Jim: Yes, you're correct on the origin of the offense. When Bill Walsh was passed over as Bengals coach by Brown and moved to San Francisco, he took the offense Brown established first in Cleveland and then in Cincinnati. As for the two-minute warning, you are correct again. It serves the double purpose of squeezing in more commercials while also allowing teams more time to strategize. It's another rule to help the offense when one score behind.
Hey, Tony: The Shurmur hire is a bust. Much better candidates were available, likeOakland OC Hue Jackson. Mike Holmgren lost a portion of the fan base today. If he's a gambling man, I'd say he crapped out. Any clues as to which coordinators Bob LaMonte represents? That should be a pretty clear indicator as to who else will be on the sidelines with Shurmur next year. What a bloated mess of an organization. -- Tim, Winter Haven, Fla.
Hey, Tim: I detect a bad vibe here.
Hey, Tony: I still do not understand why the Browns were so quick to get rid of Rob Ryan, he was the only reason we were competitive this season. Imagine what he could do with some talent. -- Justin Sacco, Phoenix
Hey, Justin: While I felt Ryan had a chance of being kept, the Browns wanted everybody on the same page. Ryan knew he'd have other DC opportunities. No team wants to keep a coach that doesn't want to be there and I think Ryan wanted out.
Hey, Tony: Do you think the Browns can win in this division with the West Coast offense? Does this style really lend itself to beating the tough physical defenses in Pittsburgh and Baltimore? I was glad to hear that Holmgren did mention that they still need to run the ball, but will they? -- Andy Gasbarre, North Royalton
Hey, Andy: I don't know how the West Coast offense will fare against Pittsburgh and Baltimore, but whatever the Browns have been trying to do on offense certainly hasn't worked. So why not try something different? The WCO uses the pass to set up the run. It's not the run-and-shoot, which didn't run the ball at all. When Mike Holmgren coached Seattle to the Super Bowl in 2005, he had the league's No. 1 rusher in Shaun Alexander. I also believe the Browns will benefit from having coaches who are expert in the system they intend to run instead of a coordinator melding a system from all those he has been exposed to.
John Kuntz / The Plain DealerMany fans are wailing about the loss of Rob Ryan as defensive coordinator. If Ryan -- and the defense -- was so good, why was Santonio Holmes' TD catch one of many big plays against the Browns? Hey, Tony: I can understand almost everything the Browns are trying to do with the coaching change except for the defense. We got to watch a defense improve to a respectable level over the last couple of years and now to blow it up and convert to a 4-3? And fire Rob Ryan who isgetting head coaching interviews? How does this make any sense at all? If it ain't broke, don't fix it. -- Steve Szabo, Encinitas, Calif.
Hey, Steve: Did you forget how many games the Browns lost after holding a lead in the fourth quarter? I realize the offense was by far the weaker unit, but the defense wasn't exactly top shelf, either.
Hey, Tony: 1. A moot point, but did the acquisition of Jayme Mitchell (4-3 defensive end) this season indicate Holmgren was already planning on switching coaches earlier than he let on? 2. With two years on injured reserve, it looked like D'Qwell Jackson was out, but will theswitch to a 4-3 make the front office take another look? A lot of our linebackers look too old and slow to run the 4-3. 3. Finally, regarding Matt Roth: Do the Browns resign him as a defensive end or lose him to free agency? -- Paul Straub, Kent
Hey, Paul: 1. It sure looks like it. Mitchell himself asked, "Why am I here?" when he arrived. 2. After severe pectoral muscle injuries two years in a row, Jackson is a long-shot. 3. This will be interesting. I understand Roth was intent on leaving via free agency if Mangini stayed. I don't know how the coaching change affects his plans. He would appear to be a fit as a 4-3 defensive end, but he might not want that.
Hey, Tony: I am happy with the new direction of the Browns under the trio of Holmgren, Heckert and Shurmur. However I am concerned that even with a 3,000-yard passer, 1,800 yard rusher and a trio of 50+ catch receivers, Holmgren's West Coast offense could only manage three points against the Steelers in Super Bowl XL. How does the West Coast offense typically fare against great 3-4 defenses like the Steelers or Ravens? -- Jeff, Huntington Beach, Calif.
Hey, Jeff: This is an issue that I will be delving into much more at a later date. In general, I think it's fair to say that most offenses -- no matter the style -- have struggled against the robust defenses of Pittsburgh and Baltimore over the past 10 years. That's one of the great challenges facing the Browns, and Bengals, for that matter.
Hey, Tony: 1) Our new HC said we must have an efficient, explosive passing game. Do we need explosive receivers to match that vision? 2) Do you think we will finally have a professionally coordinated offense, one that can make the correct adjustments during a game? -- SL Smith, Canton, Ohio
Hey, SL: 1. Need receivers who can ran after the catch. Need also the quarterback to put the ball where it's supposed to be. 2. I'm looking forward to see a fresh approach to the offensive side of the ball on game days.
Hey, Tony: I believe this team needs to take some chances on players kinda like Philadelphia with Michael Vick and Mike Williams in Seattle. What do you think, should the Browns go after Plaxico Burress? -- Shaylin Butler, Pemberton, N.J.
Hey, Shaylin: I'm going to invoke my 10-foot pole rule. No way. Besides the baggage, he'll be 34 by season's start. They need younger legs.
Dave Martin / Associated PressCan the West Coast offense really work in the NFL? Why not ask Aaron Rodgers and the Green Bay Packers? Hey, Tony: With all the talk of the Browns' going to the West Coast offense, what teams employed this scheme this last year? -- Jim T, Denver
Hey, Jim: There are different versions of the West Coast, depending on what the head coach has done to adjust to his players, his opponents, geography, etc. Teams that played some version of the West Coast offense last year were: Houston, Oakland, Green Bay, Minnesota, Philadelphia, St. Louis and Washington. Philadelphia played the system most similar to what the Browns probably will run.
Hey, Tony: Pat Shurmur will call his own plays this year? For real? Here in The Lou, where they love Shurmur for how he brought Sam Bradford along, they still rip him as an offensive coordinator. Do the Browns really want him to be head coach, and OC, and mentor Colt McCoy? Seems very foolish to me. Or will Mike Holmgren be more involved than we realize? -- Jonathan Kirk, St. Louis
Hey, Jonathan: I think Holmgren will be involved. Shurmur will be the head coach. He's looking for a coordinator and quarterbacks coach. The development of McCoy will be a group effort, I'm sure. I expect Shurmur to call a game differently than what you saw in St. Louis, where he had to take orders from a head coach from the defensive side of the ball.
Hey, Tony: Although the Browns have had consecutive 5-11 seasons, only the most severe Mangini hater can deny the team is much more disciplined and talented then when he took over. That being said, what do you think will be an acceptable record for the coming season? -- Robert Milgate, Lakewood
Hey, Robert: Nobody said Mangini did not make some advances in two seasons on the job. But NFL coaches are paid to win, not clamp down on penalties and turnover ratio. Those stats don't mean a thing when you go 5-11. An acceptable record for the 2011 season starts with at least one more win and probably a few more than that.
Hey, Tony: Please tell me the Browns are going to retain Phil Dawson. What is $3Mcompared to what they are paying others who make twice as much without the same production. Who would replace him and have the same consistency as Dawson? -- Skip Herendeen, Arlington, Texas
Hey, Skip: Maybe the Browns will come to their senses and re-sign Dawson before free agency. Then again, there may be no free agency until a collective bargaining agreement is reached. So Dawson isn't going anywhere just yet.
Hey, Tony: Now that Pat Shurmur is in the fold, what do you think the possibility isof bringing Donovan McNabb in as a starter and mentor to Colt McCoy? -- Mike Kupen, Pittsburgh
Hey, Mike: That shouldn't happen. It's time to move forward, not try to recapture another year of magic from a descending veteran QB.
Hey, Tony: I've read reports that if the Browns switch back to a 4-3 defense, Ahtyba Rubin may have a difficult time as a DT instead of a NT and not be a good fit. Could you explain the difference and give your take on it. -- Todd Jones, Deerfield Beach, Fla.
Hey, Todd: While Rubin is an excellent nose in the 3-4, I don't think he'll have trouble playing as a tackle in the 4-3. He can play in any defensive system.
Hey, Tony: With the hiring of a new coach, wouldn't it be a great time to get rid of the whole "dog/dawg" image and try to focus on the rich heritage of the Browns? I think a focus on Paul Brown's contributions would be greater than close ups of Big Dawg on TV. We need to raise the bar. -- Chris Balla, Powell, Ohio
Hey, Chris: If they win, those issues will take care of themselves. A new identity would be born from winning, trust me.
Hey, Tony: It is very clear hearing Holmgren talk that this is what he wanted all along and that there was really no way Mangini was coming back. I understand him wanting it this way, what I don't understand is why wait a year? Please do not waste our time telling us "Mike felt bad as a coach firing a coach after one year." If he knew this is what he wanted, then he wasted a year not getting building. The way I see it, next year is year 2 of the Holmgren reign and if we win 4, 5 or 6, that goes on him. I don't want any excuses about rebuilds. -- Michael Spitale, Galena, Ohio
Hey, Michael: All true. I wrote the story when he brought Mangini back in 2010 that NFL sources said it was a "win-win" situation for Holmgren. They didn't say "win-win" for the Browns. I also wrote that the case can be made that Holmgren wasted a year by not switching coaches in 2010, but he did not want to fire a coach coming off four straight wins.
Hey, Tony: I was just wondering now that Sean McDermott is out in Philadelphia, what are the odds he comes to Cleveland in some capacity? -- Brian Fitch, Ephrata, Pa.
Hey, Brian: Since you submitted your question, McDermott was hired as defensive coordinator with Carolina.
Hey, Tony: Watching the Ravens-Steelers game I was (un)pleasantly surprised by Joe Flacco. He looked like some frightened rookie and not a guy who's a sure bet to become an elite QB. At certain moments he seemed lost and couldn't wait to get rid of the ball. That couldn't but remind me of our guy Colt. If there's one thing I can bet on about him it's his poise. Then again, who am I to say -- just a biased Browns fan.
The question for you is, who would you rather have: A) strong but not the strongest arm gutless Flacco or B) weak but not the weakest arm bring them to me McCoy? -- Miroslav Stefanovic, Serbia
Hey, Miroslav: As lost as Flacco appeared to you, his team put up 24 points against the Steelers in a playoff game. If Anquan Boldin and T.J. Houshmandzadeh had not dropped passes in crucial situations, the Ravens might have won the game. Flacco has won four playoff games on the road in three seasons. McCoy has won two of eight games in his career. My answer to your question? I'd take the "gutless" Flacco any day of the week.
Hey, Tony: What is the application process like for an NFL head coach? Is there an actual application? Does the team hire a head hunter? Is there a nomination process? -- Heidi Yanok, Olmsted Falls
Hey, Heidi: When a team is looking for a head coach, the top football authority -- its president or general manager, or sometimes its owner -- conducts his search any way he wants to. The only thing he must do is interview at least one minority for the job -- the so-called Rooney Rule.
Joshua Gunter / The Plain DealerWhen it comes to Cleveland sports officials, perhaps no one has more job security than Mike Holmgren. Hey, Tony: All of the Browns' problems begin and end with the ineffective leadership of Randy Lerner. Since Mr. Lerner is unlikely to fire himself, if Pat Shurmur fails to produce a winning team during his contract, how long will Mike Holmgren last in Cleveland? I hope that this scenario doesn't arise, but given Mr. Lerner's track record, I am skeptical of seeing a Browns team in the playoffs anytime soon. -- Andrew Steckler, Beachwood
Hey, Andrew: I would expect Holmgren to fulfill the five years on his contract as Browns president whether or not Shurmur fails.
Hey, Tony: You recently said this -- "Finally, you can not name a single quarterback with a northern, outdoor-based NFL team that won anything of note in the past 30 years. Not one." You have to have meant something else, been sarcastic, or this has to be a typo. You can't possibly have forgotten Brett Favre, Tom Brady, Eli Manning, Ben Roethlisburger, Jim McMahon, Jim Kelly (Getting to 4 Super Bowls, despite losing, is still noteworthy). -- Joshua Winkler, Hilliard, Ohio
Hey, Joshua: I inadvertently omitted the phrase "with average or below-average arm strength." All the quarterbacks you mention had above-average arm strength. That's precisely the point I was trying to make. The noodle-armed quarterbacks might win something with dome-based teams or in the sunny climes, but not up here. The best recent example I can think of is Chad Pennington. In his prime -- before multiple shoulder injuries -- he had all the intangibles that Colt McCoy has. But his weak arm caught up with him in the months of December and January and he ultimately won nothing. I realize Browns fans are extremely sensitive about questioning McCoy's potential. They do fall in love rather quickly.
Hey, Tony: Two years ago before the NFL draft you described Rey Maualuga as a "must get player" for the Browns and you were "disgusted" the Browns passed on him. I have never seen a sports writer so obsessed with an individual player before a draft. Now after two years of mediocre play, can you finally just admit you were grossly incorrect in your evaluation of this guy (It's OK ... you're not the GM). Off the field issues aside, this past year he had a modest 75 tackles and 1 sack and really is turning into a situational third-down player for the Bengals. Please admit you were wrong and I promise I will move on. -- Chris Basmagy, Columbus
Hey, Chris: If you don't think Maualuga could not start for the Browns, you are watching different games on Sunday than I am.
Also, if you don't think the Browns blew their draft in 2009, you are living in La-La Land, not Columbus.
Hey, Tony: The Browns have obviously been an inept, dysfunctional organization since their return in 1999. Which regime do you think set the Browns back the furthest? Was it Chris Palmer, Butch Davis, Mangini, etc? -- Mark White, Wadsworth
Hey, Mark: This is an interesting one. Because the foundation of the expansion era was laid in the first two seasons, I think the first regime set them back the farthest. And I don't blame Chris Palmer for that. I'm talking about Carmen Policy and Dwight Clark. Their decisions on personnel and team management started tipping the dominoes.
Hey, Tony: There has been much hyperbole regarding Colt "can't do wrong" McCoy from a lot of fans, including most area beat writers. For example, when Jake Delhomme played, no matter what he did it wasn't good enough. With McCoy, the receiver should had helped him to avoid interceptions. I was only waiting for the sun's glare from Delhomme's clipboard to be the next culprit.
Colt's only played in six games and the final three were basically disasters, so a more thoughtful approach should be in order, don't you think? All that said I agree with your arm strength assessment when I look at Ben in Pitts and Rogers in GB, they both have cannon arms that cut through any and all inclement northern winter weather. Assuming a guy with the same pedigree were available for the Browns to take with their first pick, would you take him? -- Johnathan Woodliff, Massillon, Ohio
Hey, Johnathan: I am not advocating taking a quarterback with the No. 6 overall pick. I am advocating researching each of the quarterbacks available in this draft thoroughly and then asking this question: Can Colt McCoy take this team, in this climate, in this division, to the Super Bowl? Unless that answer is a resounding "yes," then I would seriously consider the best quarterback with the Browns' first pick. They can change regimes, change coaches, change owners. Until they find "the" quarterback, they are going nowhere. Is McCoy "the guy"? I honestly don't know, but there are men in the building being paid a ton of money to come up with the right answer.
Hey, Tony: There is all this talk, at least from the media, that it's McCoy's job to lose but one thing that I've not heard to date is the possibility of Seneca Wallace being our starter. 1. He knows the WC offense. 2. He is relatively young at 30. 3. He has the strong arm needed for Cleveland weather. 4. He seemed to get better each game before his injury; meaning he threwthe ball around instead of locking in on one guy. I think it's an intriguing possibility. I like what he brings physically and with him knowing the system might be the better choice for 2011. -- Randy McGuire, Orlando, Fla.
Hey, Randy: A couple things. 1. Wallace's contract is up, but I would expect the Browns to re-sign him. 2. Although Wallace does have a good arm, he doesn't seem to read the whole field and disperse the ball to all his receivers. That said, I think he is a very good backup quarterback who certainly should be retained by a club converting to the West Coast offense.
Hey, Tony: I know the coaches had reason to use two tight end sets more often during the later part of the season, but it seems to me that it resulted in less time on the field for Lawrence Vickers. I think that may have been a major contributor to the reduction of Peyton Hillis' yards per carry, and increased wear and tear on his body. Do we have the yards-per-carry average for Hillis with and without Vickers on the field? -- Seren Hrachian, Athens, N.Y.
Hey, Seren: I do not have the figures you requested. However, I couldn't agree more with you. In fact, I included taking Vickers off the field on my list of the 10 Great Mysteries of the Browns' 2010 season.
Hey, Tony: Outside of adding an impact WR, and depth at RB to go with Hillis and Hardesty (we can't have another year where an injury leaves us with just one viable RB), would you agree that the front seven of the defense needs the most attention? The roster is not even close to having the players to run a 4-3 defense. Also, do you think the trade for Jayme Mitchell way back when was a tip off on the coaching change? -- Matt Alsip, Towson, Md.
Hey, Matt: I agree the front seven of the defense is in need of serious upgrade. As GM Tom Heckert implied, an upgrade was needed even before the switch to the 4-3 based on age alone. The Mitchell trade -- one of my 10 Great Mysteries -- clearly was a tipoff of what came to pass.
Hey, Tony: Given the fact the Browns will probably move to a 4-3 and will need quick sideline-to-sideline linebackers, do you think the Browns will consider Casey Matthews in the draft? How can you miss with a kid whose father was a mainstay for years, whose uncle played in the NFL for 1,000 years and whose brother is an emerging star? -- Jim Bays, Denton, Texas
Hey, Jim: Well, the Mangini Browns missed the boat on the best of the Matthews sons, Clay III. I don't think anyone projects Casey as a first-round talent. That doesn't mean he doesn't bear a very close look.
Hey, Tony: With the likelihood the Browns switch to a 4-3 defense, does that increase the chances that they take a defensive lineman with their first pick (such as Nick Fairley from Auburn) over a wide receiver (such as AJ Green of Georgia)? -- Rich Smith, Columbus
Hey, Rich: I was touting defensive line help long before the apparent switch to the 4-3 scheme. Receivers can be had in any round.
Hey, Tony: Prior to Mangini getting fired, on the "Point After" show you pointed out that firing Mangini wouldn't constitute a complete change. However in your Jan. 16 column you lamented the big changes coming on offense and defense. Which is it? -- Mike B, Dover, Ohio
Hey, Mike: As an avid viewer of the Point After, you probably know my point was that in every previous case in the expansion era, the Browns fired their coach and their football GM. In this case, they were just firing the coach and the top level of management -- President Mike Holmgren and GM Tom Heckert -- were still on board. As Heckert explained the day Pat Shurmur was introduced, "big changes" were coming on the roster regardless of the coaching change because of excessive age.
Hey, Tony: Since Nnamdi Asomugha is available as a free agent, could the Browns actually trade the sixth pick in the draft for him straight up instead of waiting until he is a free agent? I know it's a stretch, but I would make that move in a heartbeat. He is experienced, hitting his prime, you know what you would be getting (instead of an unproven rookie). -- Eric Myers, Victoria, Minn.
Hey, Eric: There can be no trade of players until there is a new collective bargaining agreement. Further, it's my understanding that Asomugha's contract has been voided and he is technically unsigned and is a free agent as of the new NFL calendar year.
-- Tony