Do you agree with the voters protesting Cam Newton as a Heisman candidate?
Auburn's Cam Newton is the best player in college football, but several voters out of the 925 writes and former Heisman winners will not vote for Newton.
That's right, Philadelphia reporter Michael Bradley and Kyle Tucker of the Virginian-Pilot are two among six voters who will not vote for Newton because of the allegations against him.
Does it really matter? Does making a point mean anything when Newton is clearly the best player in college. Or should the NCAA try to avoid a situation like Reggie Bush?