"The question of how the money is spent is a valid one, but when the Executive Director of the Players Association is apparently satisfied with how most teams are utilizing it, it kind makes you think that the Indians, as well as the rest of the teams, aren't just pocketing it. It would be nice to see a little more transparency, but if owners were simply pocketing it, you would think that one organization that wouldn't be happy about it would be the Players Association." - halfwayhouse
In response to the story Players union official explains, defends baseball's revenue-sharing plan: All-Star Game Insider, cleveland.com reader halfwayhouse isn't too concerned about where revenue sharing money is going. This reader writes,
"The question of how the money is spent is a valid one, but when the Executive Director of the Players Association is apparently satisfied with how most teams are utilizing it, it kind makes you think that the Indians, as well as the rest of the teams, aren't just pocketing it. It would be nice to see a little more transparency, but if owners were simply pocketing it, you would think that one organization that wouldn't be happy about it would be the Players Association."
To respond to halfwayhouse's comment, go here.
For more comments of the day, go to blog.cleveland.com/comments-of-the-day.