Here is what the four-team playoffs would have looked like dating back to the 2002 Ohio State-Miami matchup if this coming format had been adopted then.
COLUMBUS, Ohio -- College football will have a four-team playoff starting with the 2014 season, when the current TV deals run out. That much was determined by the meetings last weekend between conference commissioners. What remains now are details.
But this news hammers home everything that college football has been denied during the BCS era. Going by final BCS standings, here is what the four-team playoffs would have looked like dating back to the 2002 Ohio State-Miami matchup if this coming format had been adopted then.
2011
No. 1 Alabama vs. No. 4 Stanford
No. 2 LSU vs. No. 3 Oklahoma State
What really happened: Two defensive-minded SEC teams rematched in a title game that drew complaints in the buildup and during Alabama's win.
What would have happened: Those two defenses would have been tested by great offenses led by future first-round draft picks at quarterback in Stanford's Andrew Luck and Oklahoma State's Brandon Weeden. Three tightly-packed one-loss teams would have had a shot in the mix with undefeated LSU.
2010
No. 1 Auburn vs. No. 4 Stanford
No. 2 Oregon vs. No. 3 TCU
What really happened: Auburn beat Oregon in an undefeated showdown that left undefeated TCU out in the cold. The Horned Frogs finished with a perfect record after a Rose Bowl win over Wisconsin.
What would have happened: All three undefeated teams would have been given a shot while the battle for the fourth spot between Stanford and Wisconsin would have created great debate.
2009
No. 1 Alabama vs. No. 4 TCU
No. 2 Texas vs. No. 3 Cincinnati
What really happened: Two classic, undefeated programs met for the title while two other undefeated programs with less tradition were told too bad, as was undefeated Boise State.
What would have happened: Four of the five undefeated teams would have been given a shot instead of two of the five. That's a lot closer to fair, and it would have created two semis with underdog themes.
2008
No. 1 Oklahoma vs. No. 4 Alabama
No. 2 Florida vs. No. 3 Texas
What really happened: Seven teams finished with one loss, while two others were undefeated, with the Sooners and Gators getting the lucky one-loss title game lottery balls.
What would have happened: From those nine teams there still would have been debate and no perfect answer -- just two semis featuring four powerhouses that could have set up a rivalry title game two different ways. Adding Texas and Alabama to a playoff for a title can't be bad.
2007
No. 1 Ohio State vs. No. 4 Oklahoma
No. 2 LSU vs. No. 3 Virginia Tech
What really happened: Ohio State and LSU both stumbled into the title game when other teams suffered more devastating late-season losses, and the Tigers became the first two-loss national champion.
What would have happened: The Buckeyes would have made it as a one-loss team, while three of the other one- or two-loss teams would have gotten a shot. Undefeated Hawaii still wouldn't have made it, to the delight of the small conference doubters.
2006
No. 1 Ohio State vs. No. 4 LSU
No. 2 Florida vs. No. 3 Michigan
What really happened: Undefeated Ohio State beat undefeated Michigan in the last game of the regular season, starting rallying cries for an All-Big Ten rematch in the championship. Instead, Florida jumped the Wolverines and mauled the Buckeyes.
What would have happened: Florida and Michigan would have settled the debate over No. 2 on the field, while the Big Ten-SEC semis would have ramped up that conference rivalry even more. If Ohio State and Michigan had rematched for the title, the semifinal wins by both would have legitimized the idea, because they had to earn it.
2005
No. 1 USC vs. No. 4 Ohio State
No. 2 Texas vs. No. 3 Penn State
What really happened: The Trojans and Longhorns were the only undefeated teams and set up a classic championship with which everyone agreed, and the game, topped by Texas quarterback Vince Young's last-minute touchdown run, lived up the hype. Yea, BCS.
What would have happened: Dang, two traditional powers would have delayed the chance of that showdown. (Sarcasm alert.) Nobody would have watched Joe Paterno's guys trying to stop Young, right? And A.J. Hawk, Donte Whitner and the OSU defense vs. Matt Leinart, Reggie Bush and the USC offense probably would have been viewed as a waste of time. Stupid playoff.
2004
No. 1 USC vs. No. 4 Texas
No. 2 Oklahoma vs. No. 3 Auburn
What really happened: Five teams were undefeated -- USC, Oklahoma, Auburn, Utah and Boise State -- and though the Tigers probably had the best resume, they were left out of the title game while USC beat Oklahoma, 55-19, to win it.
What would have happened: Justice for the most aggrieved team of the BCS era -- Auburn would have had a shot at the title, while Utah and Boise State still would have been left on the sideline. But, obviously, this solution would have been a huge improvement.
2003
No. 1 Oklahoma vs. 4 Michigan
No. 2 USC vs. No. 3 LSU
What really happened: The Sooners were upset in the Big 12 title game yet remained at No. 1, then lost to LSU in the national championship. USC, meanwhile, won the AP share of the national title after taking down Michigan in the Rose Bowl. Split title.
What should have happened: Something other than a split title. Michigan would have made the playoff as the clear No. 4 team, and the champion could have been decided on the field. Split champions will certainly end in the new format.
2002
No. 1 Miami vs. No. 4 USC
No. 2 Ohio State vs. No. 3 Georgia
What really happened: No. 1 Miami and No. 2 Ohio State finished as the only undefeated regular-season teams before the Buckeyes won their first national title since 1968 with a win in the Fiesta Bowl. The overtime had controversy, but determining the matchup did not.
What should have happened: Georgia, the one-loss SEC champ, two-loss USC or maybe one-loss Iowa -- which finished No. 5 in the BCS standings but might have been chosen over USC by a selection committee -- would have had a shot. The real title game couldn't have been topped, though.