There will be several good players available at the No. 6 spot in the first round, and the Browns could use a deal to add some picks, hopefully a second-rounder.
Dave Martin, Associated PressRunning back Trent Richardson (3) of Alabama likely would be available at the No. 6 pick if the Browns decide to trade down.
About the Browns trading down . . .
If the Browns have a chance to trade their No. 4 pick to the St. Louis Rams -- and receive the No. 6 pick along with a second-rounder -- I'd do it.
I'd do it for the same reason the Rams are publicly saying they will probably stay at No. 6 -- there are several good players from whom to pick.
Supposedly, the Rams would be content with any of these players: offensive tackle Matt Kalil, defensive back Mo Claiborne, receiver Justin Blackmon and running back Trent Richardson.
I don't believe that.
I doubt they'd take Richardson at No. 6, because they have a superb running back in Steven Jackson.
Early reports are that the Rams want Blackmon, and early reports often have more validity than what you hear closer to the draft as teams want to confuse everyone. The Rams also could use Kalil, a franchise-type tackle, to plug a hole in a leaky offensive line.
So no matter what the Rams say, I bet they'd love to have the No. 4 pick.
And the Browns should accommodate them, but only if St. Louis adds a second-rounder. The Rams have their own (No. 33) and one that belongs to Washington (No. 39).
Consider these names: T.J. Ward, Montario Hardesty, Jabaal Sheard and Greg Little.
Those are the second-rounders drafted the past two years by Browns General Manager Tom Heckert. The miss was gambling on the injury-prone Hardesty. The other three players have been starters. Sheard is the team's top pass rusher, Little the best receiver.
So if I can add a second-round pick by dropping from No. 4 to No. 6, I'd do it. I love the idea of Heckert having four picks in the top 39: No. 6, No. 22 (from Atlanta), No. 37 and No. 39 (Washington from the Rams).
APRyan Tannehill's stock is way up, but taking him might be a mistake.
About Ryan Tannehill . . .
The Browns must take Ryan Tannehill.
Over and over, we hear that. Just as we heard the Browns must trade up for Robert Griffin III.
Now there's not supposed to be a big difference between Tannehill and RG3. That's according to ESPN draft analyst Todd McShay.
To be exact, McShay said on a conference call: "I don't think the difference between Robert Griffin III and Tannehill is all that big. I really don't. I'd have a very difficult time passing on him at that No. 4 pick. I just think he has everything you look for in a future franchise quarterback if you develop him properly and you're willing to be patient."
I have one comment . . . really?
Washington offered three first-rounders and a second-rounder to the Rams for the rights to take RG3. The Browns supposedly offered their No. 4 and No. 22 picks this season, plus a future first-rounder.
Does anyone believe Tannehill is worth anything close to that kind of package?
RG3 started 40 games at Baylor, completed 67 percent of his passes and had 78 touchdowns, compared with 17 interceptions. He's a terrific student who graduated early, has exceptional speed and coaches rave about his football acumen.
Tannehill started 19 games in the past two years at Texas A&M. He is a good athlete who played receiver early in his career. He threw 42 touchdowns, compared with 21 interceptions.
I tend to agree with ESPN's Mel Kiper Jr., who said: "He's being overdrafted. . . . We saw it last year with Christian Ponder. He should've been a second-round pick. Overdrafting is taking place at quarterback, and it's going to happen again with Ryan Tannehill."
If the Browns stay at No. 4, they probably will have a shot at three of these four players: the best tackle (Matt Kalil), the best running back (Trent Richardson), the best cornerback (Mo Claiborne) and the best receiver (Justin Blackmon). Only one of those will be gone.
Tannehill is the No. 3-rated quarterback and considered a quarterback not nearly as polished or NFL ready as Andrew Luck or RG3. He's not the player that the Browns should take at No. 4 . . . and perhaps not at No. 6, if they do indeed trade down with the Rams.
MCTThe Cavs' Tristan Thompson.
About the Cavs . . .
1. The Cavs are expected to bring back Anderson Varejao at some point in April because A) He really wants to play. B) The Cavs want him to begin playing with Tristan Thompson. They think Varejao will have a significant impact on the Cavs' rookie big man. The front office also wants to watch how the team performs with Varejao.
2. Thompson is making progress, averaging 12.6 points and 8.3 rebounds in 33 minutes as a starter. That covers seven games. On the season, he's at 6.2 rebounds per game. Only Denver's Kenneth Faried (7.0) is a better rebounder as a rookie. Second overall pick Derrick Williams is averaging 8.8 points, 4.9 rebounds and shooting 43 percent.
3. There are only seven rookies averaging at least 10 points. Five are point guards: Kyrie Irving (18.7), Brandon Knight (12.6), Kemba Walker (12.2), Ricky Rubio (10.6) and Isaiah Thomas (10.5). The other two are shooting guards: MarShon Brooks (12.8) and Klay Thompson (10.5). So no big man is making a huge impact as a rookie.
4. On the year, Tristan Thompson is averaging 7.7 points and shooting only 43 percent from the field. His free-throw shooting is up to 53 percent. He'll never be an offensive force, but he can score near the basket with offensive rebounds, lobs and short hooks (if he works on it). The key for him is playing to his strength -- rebounding, shot blocking and sprinting down the court to catch passes for layups and dunks on the fast break.
5. The Cavs believe the combination of Varejao and Thompson can give the team excellent interior defense. They also believe the 6-9 Thompson will be more effective at his natural power forward position. He has been playing a lot of center since Varejao fractured his wrist.
6. The fact that big men tend to develop slower than guards is a reason the Cavs should be patient with Samardo Samuels. While this is his second year with the Cavs, he should be a senior at Louisville. He turned pro after his sophomore season, wasn't drafted, then signed with the Cavs. Most scouts thought he left school too early.
7. While Samuels shows promise, I just don't see much with Semih Erden -- he's a big guy who seems slow to react to most plays. He'll be 26 in July. Compare that to Samuels, who can be a bullish scorer inside. He turned 23 in January.
8. A year ago, it was thought the Cavs and most teams had Harrison Barnes in the top three of the draft. He decided to stay in school. This year, Barnes is being projected in the draft in the six-to-10 range, which may be where the Cavs draft. It's hard to warm up to Barnes, who came into the ACC with incredible hype -- being named a first team All-American before he played his first game at North Carolina.
9. Now it's fashionable to reject Barnes. He shot 20-of-61 in the NCAA Tournament, too often looking a bit lost and unable to create his own shot. He's supposed to be an elite athlete, but that's not the case. He's a pretty good outside shooter and certainly would benefit at small forward with Irving setting him up for open jumpers. And despite the rise of Alonzo Gee, the Cavs desperately need small forwards and shooting guards.
10. As a sophomore, Barnes shot 45 percent from the field, 38 percent on 3-pointers, while averaging 17.3 points and 5.2 rebounds. He's 6-9, 223 pounds. There's a reasonable chance Barnes may be a good pro in time, but not the instant franchise-changer many predicted when he was a senior in high school.
About the Tribe . . .
1. In 2011, the Tribe's farm system was ranked No. 7 by Baseball America. This year, it's No. 29. What happened? Here a list of the 2011 top 10 prospects: 1) Lonnie Chisenhall. 2) Alex White. 3) Jason Kipnis. 4) Drew Pomeranz. 5) Nick Weglarz. 6). Jason Knapp. 7) LeVon Washington. 8) Tony Wolters. 9) Joe Gardner. 10) Nick Hagadone.
2. It became the Ubaldo Jimenez deal. Most fans know Pomeranz is set to be in the Rockies' starting rotation. White is battling for a spot in the bullpen. Gardner was 3-3 with a 2.48 ERA at Class AA Tulsa after the deal -- and he's expected to be at Class AAA for the Rockies. So three of the top nine were traded.
3. Kipnis is in the majors. Chisenhall and Hagadone are at Class AAA, but they are expected to be in Cleveland at some point this season. Wolters and Washington were picked in 2010 and are expected to play at Class A. Injuries wiped out Weglarz (knee) and Knapp (shoulder surgery). Who knows if either of these guys will remain healthy enough to arrive in Cleveland?
4. In 2012, the only ones still on the list are Hagadone and Wolters. Baseball America projected Chisenhall to start in Cleveland, so he wasn't on the list. The new top 10: 1) Francisco Lindor. 2) Dillon Howard. 3) Hagadone. 4) Chen Lee. 5) Luigi Rodriguez. 6) Zach McAllister. 7) Wolters. 8) Austin Adams. 9) Scott Barnes. 10) Zach Putnam.
5. Here we go again. After the list came out, Putnam was traded to . . . you guessed it . . . Colorado, for Kevin Slowey.
6. The good news is Lee, McAllister and Barnes may all be in Cleveland this season. Starters Barnes and McAllister were impressive in big-league training camp. Lee throws in the middle 90s and is a viable bullpen option.
7. Lindor was the No. 8 pick in the 2011 draft, and he's universally loved by the experts -- he is rated the Tribe's top prospect despite only five games at Mahoning Valley.
8. Vice President of Player Development Ross Atkins on Lindor: "What's not to like about him? He plays hard and has fun doing it. He has the skills to play shortstop in the big leagues. He can steal a base, he makes solid contact at the plate and he brings real energy."
9. The Indians also rave about Dorssys Paulino, an 18-year-old shortstop from the Dominican Republic who signed for $1 million. Wolters (a $1.4 million bonus in 2010) may move from short to second because the system is rich in shortstops at the lower levels. Not only is there Lindor and Paulino, but they also are high on shortstop Ronny Rodriguez.
10. No one with the Tribe talks about this, but with all the young shortstops, there is no reason to give Asdrubal Cabrera something like a five-year, $50 million deal as he approaches free agency after the 2013 season. That's especially true after Cabrera arrived in camp heavy again and may one day have to move to second or third base.