From coaches' doghouses to draft strategies to fair play in lopsided games, there's plenty of questions in this week's mailbag.
PD fileEvan Moore's four touchdown catches equaled the best of any Brown receiver in 2011, but he certainly seemed to have some ups and downs during the season. Hey, Tony: Much was said before the season began about incorporating Evan Moore into the offense, but we never saw much of him on the field. Is it because of blocking limitations or did he end up in somebody's doghouse? Do you think his talents would be better utilized as a WR? -- Ken Knapp, Ft. Lauderdale, Fla.
Hey, Ken: I felt there was a period of the season when Moore was in the doghouse. The specific reasons for that, I don't know. The fact is he co-led the team in receiving TDs with four. I think Moore is best utilized as a tight end who can be flexed to the outside to create mismatches.
Hey, Tony: Word 'round the campfire is that the Steelers would be slapping a first-round tender on Mike Wallace as a restricted free agent. If the Browns were to pluck from the Steelers' tree in the off-season, could the Browns give either the fourth or 22nd pick, or would it have to be the higher of the picks? Wouldn't the Browns be wise to make this move? -- Ashley Elder, Columbus
Hey, Ashley: If a team owns more than one pick in the first round, its original pick is the one that must be used in compensation for signing a restricted free agent. So the Browns would have to give up their No. 4 pick. Don't get your hopes up. The Steelers will not let Wallace leave in free agency. They always find a way to keep the players they want to keep.
Hey, Tony: Unlike a vast majority of Browns fans, I am fairly optimistic. In just two drafts the defense has turned the corner into a very competitive unit. Logic says Heckert can do this with a couple of drafts to the offense -- as well as add a few key free agents. It seems like the Browns are finally building something instead of going for the quick fix. Do you agree? -- Todd Edmond, Tiffin
Hey, Todd: I would agree with your assessment on defense. Now, about that offense.
Hey, Tony: I think the Browns, assuming everything magically works in their favor, should draft Justin Blackmon at No. 4 and Michael Floyd at No. 22. Although it would be risky, if one works out the team would be in great position in the future. If both work out ... well that'd be a Browns fan's dream! Then 2013 can be used to find a QB (if necessary), and at that point the next QB or McCoy would be working with established NFL wide receivers. -- Kyle Chormanski, Los Angeles
Hey, Kyle: Doubling up at wide receiver was tried in 2009 when the Browns drafted Brian Robiskie and Mohamed Massaquoi in the second round. That hasn't worked out. Your point about supporting the quarterback with a blue-chip receiver is valid. That's why I wanted the Browns to take Julio Jones at No. 6 last year.
Hey, Tony: How did Kevin Kolb perform for the Cardinals and how high are the Cards on Skelton after they went 6-2 with him at the helm? -- Felix DeAngelis, Charlotte, N.C.
Hey, Felix: Kolb was fairly bad. The team was 2-6 with Kolb as starting quarterback. Kolb was schooled four years in the West Coast offense in Philadelphia, but Arizona runs a different system and Kolb did not exactly take to it. He was also plagued by a foot injury and a concussion that affected his first season.
Hey, Tony: ESPN's Gregg Easterbrook suggests that we'll be seeing more, not less, of the shotgun spread offense. Do you think that's true and, if so, are the Browns already behind the times in trying to institute the West Coast offense? -- Rory Wohl, Chagrin Falls
Hey, Rory: Obviously, the NFL trend is more multiple-receiver formations, but I don't necessarily see more shotgun spread offense like in the college game. Pro coaches want their quarterbacks to throw from the pocket. All the NFL rules favor the passing game, though, so variations of the passing game are going to be exploited by the good coaches until defenses can catch up. Ultimately, the trend will revert to the running game. All these trends are cyclical.
Hey, Tony: Really surprised the lack of activity dealing with coaching changes. Do you know who is the front runner for the OC job? -- Michael Knopf, Atlanta
Hey, Michael: My guess is Mike Sherman.
Hey, Tony: Recently you said the days of spending five years to build a winner are over. Three of the four teams remaining in the playoffs have had stable systems, with only San Francisco turning it around quickly. Are there any examples of complete rebuilds and Super Bowl rings in less than five years? -- Dan, Salem
Hey, Dan: Super Bowl rings in two years? No. Complete turnarounds to playoff team in two years? Yes. Bill Parcells did it with just about every team he coached. Atlanta recently did it. Baltimore did it immediately under John Harbaugh. Obviously, the consistent, elite playoff teams have been built over time.
Paul Connors, Associated PressIs Oklahoma State's Justin Blackmon a likely selection of the Browns with the fourth pick in the first round in April? Tony Grossi has his doubts. Hey, Tony: I think the Browns should sit on their No. 4 pick because no matter what happens they will be able to select one of the top four or five offensive players available. Players like Matt Kalil, Justin Blackmon, Robert Griffin III, and Trent Richardson. -- Ray Giambelluca, Memphis, Miss.
Hey, Ray: My early hunch is that Griffin and Richardson will be available at No. 4.
Hey, Tony: Watching the Alamo Bowl game I saw someone with an amazing arm. I also noticed RGIII never stepped into a throw. Do you try to get more talent for Colt or take a chance on a kid with an amazing arm? I know a good quarterback makes all the difference. -- Michael Knopf, Atlanta
Hey, Michael: I also share your doubts about Griffin. His physical talents (throwing, running) are obvious. I don't like his size, however, or his inability to stay in the pocket and let pass routes develop. He is a smart player, however, and all indications are that he can learn the pro game. His physical attributes might get him on the field sooner than the typical rookie, but he will need superb coaching to develop.
Hey, Tony: After watching the Holmgren-Heckert press conference, it seems clear the Browns will not be chasing big-money free agents. The strategy to keep building through the draft is one I agree with, but one free agent that I'd love to see them pursue would be Ravens OG Ben Grubbs. With the looming contract negotiations of Ray Rice, could Grubbs possibly be wrestled away, and do you think the Browns would chase him? I'd hate to see D'Qwell Jackson walk out the door. Would you put your money on him returning? -- Michael Nyerges, Cincinnati
Hey, Michael: Yes, I believe Jackson will return. As for Grubbs, I doubt the Ravens let him walk. If they do, I doubt the Browns would pursue him. He's a big-ticket free agent item and the Browns already have four big contracts devoted to offensive linemen (Joe Thomas, Alex Mack, Eric Steinbach, Tony Pashos).
Hey, Tony: Tom Heckert said this year it would be hard to screw up the No. 4 pick. I think that is true if he does not move up or down. As many as three of these studs will be available: RGIII, Justin Blackmon, Trent Richardson and Morris Claiborne. In what order would you rank them? -- Joe Casteel, Lorain
Hey, Joe: I really can't rank them at this point. Forgetting the names, I would rank the positions this way: quarterback, wide receiver, cornerback, running back. I think the Browns' draft strategy won't be settled until they acquire a few players in free agency, which starts on March 13.
Hey, Tony: You stated that Ryan Tannehill was a second-round pick. Most draft experts have Tannehill rated as the third-best QB in this draft now that Matt Barkley and Landry Jones have decided to return for their senior years. Don't you think Miami and Washington will be willing to trade down so as to enable them to nab Tannehill as well as extra picks? -- Felix DeAngelis, Charlotte, N.C.
Hey, Felix: It's premature to speculate. Tannehill reportedly suffered a foot fracture recently and had to drop out of the college all-star games. If he's not healthy by the time of the NFL combine, his draft status could slump.
Hey, Tony: Playing on lousy teams can often cost players recognition in things like the Pro Bowl, All-Pro teams, and other awards. What about the HOF? Assume that Joe Thomas plays another five years at the same level, makes more Pro Bowls while the Browns stay mired in wishing-for-mediocrity. It would seem to me he'd be a good candidate for enshrinement, but would playing on a bad team cost him the ultimate individual award, or make him wait longer than he should? -- Josh Winkler, Hilliard
Hey, Josh: If Thomas made the Pro Bowl in each of his first 10 years in the NFL, that would be a pretty good opening argument for induction into the Hall of Fame. I think winning teams help a lot with individual awards, but we have seen many examples of the Hall of Fame opening its door to elite players who were not fortunate to play on winning or championship teams.
Hey, Tony: Would it be wise to overspend on a free-agent receiver like DeSean Jackson or running back like Matt Forte both at the end of their rookie contracts and then draft best players available? We have a lot of salary cap room. -- Anthony Griggs, Brunswick
Hey, Anthony: Jackson has too much baggage for my liking. Forte is an excellent player. However, the price tag for elite players coming off their rookie contracts is exorbitant. That's one reason Tom Heckert is against loading up in free agency. You are buying players at a high cost with no guarantee their level of play will exceed that which they already have shown.
Hey, Tony: Can you provide an example where a consistently bad team turned it around in one or even two years and became a perennial playoff contender? It would just be a lot easier to swallow all the criticism out there if there was a true example of a long-term, one-season turn around. -- Paul Straub, Orlando, Fla.
Hey, Paul: One example is Atlanta. The Falcons were 4-12 in 2007 and in disarray after the Michael Vick dogfighting scandal and the desertion of coach Bobby Petrino. After cleaning house, the Falcons went 11-5 in 2008, 9-7 in 2009, 13-3 in 2010 and 10-6 in 2011. They made the playoffs the past two years for the first time in back-to-back seasons.
Hey, Tony: With the fevered interest in Matt Flynn building, I decided to watch his six-TD game more closely. I asked myself, could Colt McCoy make those same passes? My conclusion, after watching Colt over the past two seasons, was yes. They were not extraordinary throws. They were the throws of a good quarterback in a good system, a quarterback who has practiced in that system, and is blessed with great surrounding parts. Am I crazy to think that if the Browns were to develop their current offense, develop McCoy, and build his surrounding parts, we would actually be getting somewhere? If as you say, the AFC North needs a big, strong-armed quarterback, draft one later and develop him while continuing with McCoy for now. -- Chris Cappiello, Richmond, Va.
Hey, Chris: No doubt your scenario is among the options being considered by the Browns. It's not an easy call.
Hey, Tony: Two of my biggest gripes about the Savage and Mangini regimes was that the teams were not only bad, but old and overpaid. Because of that, I believe that a lot of Holmgren's/Heckert's decisions have been driven mainly by cap considerations. What is the Browns' current cap availability? Has the new CBA made any changes to the cap rules? -- Joe Gombach, Franklin, Ind.
Hey, Joe: I can't cite you the amount of cap room the Browns have going into 2012, but I do know they are comfortably under. They've unloaded many cumbersome salaries over the past two years to put themselves in a favorable position. The new cap rules are very similar to the old ones. One change is that beginning in 2013, teams will be required to spend a higher minimum (floor) than previously. That will force historically low-paying teams (Tampa Bay, Cincinnati, etc.) to upgrade their player payroll to abide by the new rules.
Associated PressOpponents shouldn't expect much mercy from Bill Belichick in blowouts. Hey, Tony: I can't understand with the score so far out of reach why didn't (Bill Belichick) take (Tom Brady) out of the Denver playoff game? -- Donald Pasqualetti, Reading
Hey, Donald: Belichick historically has had the philosophy of playing his starters throughout blowout games and at the end of seasons with playoffs already clinched. The prime example of this was in 2007 when the Patriots did not let up and finished the regular season at 16-0 despite clinching home-field advantage with two weeks to go. They rolled over two opponents in the playoffs and then were upset in the Super Bowl by the Giants.
Hey, Tony: It seems like there are a lot of questions about trading down, or building around Colt McCoy. Shouldn't priority one be a franchise quarterback? Brady elevates players. Don't you think the Browns need to at least try and find a QB who does the same? -- Doug Shaffer, Orange, Calif.
Hey, Doug: I share your opinion. Granted, there are more ways than one to build a championship team, but I believe the top-echelon QB does elevate a team. Doing it the opposite way -- finding the right players to elevate the quarterback -- takes a lot longer. It's analogous to a touchdown drive. Do you want to go for the throat and attack or dink-and-dunk, possess the ball, and risk losing it by turnover?
Hey, Tony: Mike Florio reported that the Saints are going to have free agency problems, because they have to figure out how to sign not only Drew Brees, but guard Carl Nicks and WR Marques Colston. They just signed a huge deal to keep Jahri Evans, and nobody thinks Brees is going anywhere. Maybe they the franchise tag on Nicks to keep him, but what about Colston? If any of these players become bona fide free agents, do you think Tom Heckert will chase them? -- Jim Jarrell, Lakewood
Hey, Jim: I would hesitate to add another high-ticket item to the offensive line. The Browns already are paying big salaries to four -- Joe Thomas, Eric Steinbach, Alex Mack and Tony Pashos. Colston is interesting, as is his teammate Robert Meacham. I have found in the past, however, that receivers who develop in their formative years on a dome-based team have problems making the adjustment to a cold-weather team. Not insurmountable, mind you, but a factor to consider.
Hey, Tony: I love Josh Cribbs as much as the next fan. He has been a great teammate and great to the organization. I think we got him in the wrong decade though ... when it didn't matter how good he was because we were so bad. Do you think the Browns would consider getting rid of him while he has some value left? It would be hard to see him go, but this is a business, right? -- Brian Henighan, Medina
Hey, Brian: I don't understand the criticism Cribbs has taken the past year. He concluded the season with career highs in catches (41), yards (518) and receiving TDs (4) and also sneaked in his first return for a touchdown in two years. He remains one of the best special teams tacklers in the NFL. I wouldn't trade him.
Hey, Tony: Could this happen? The Browns trade the No. 4 pick to Redskins for their No. 6 and Brian Orakpo. This would get the Redskins RGIII, who they may want bad and we would get that fast outside linebacker we need so badly. Also, why has there been such minimal talk about the Browns drafting Justin Blackmon? -- Matt Jaffe, New York, N.Y.
Hey, Matt: The Redskins wouldn't make that deal. Everyone assumes they are interested in Griffin, but there is also the possibility they will pursue a quarterback in free agency. That's why draft speculation is premature until we see the first month of free agency, starting March 13. Some draftniks consider Blackmon a lesser-ranked receiver than Julio Jones from a year ago. If the Browns passed on Jones, it's doubtful they would take Blackmon at No. 4.
Hey, Tony: I enjoyed Bill Lubinger's piece on the building of a championship franchise. It seems to me that it was intended to show us the philosophy Mike Holmgren is following to build this team. What did you think? -- Stephen Bickerton, Avon Lake
Hey, Stephen: I guess it's the tried-and-true way of doing it. Most of the experts quoted in the very fine article built their teams in the 70s and 80s -- before the advent of free agency. I'm not advocating building through free agency. I just think the lag time can be accelerated in this era. Ultimately, it takes a lot of right choices.
Hey, Tony: You responded "Amen" when a reader, after seeing another great Brees performance, stated "I'm sick and tired of the Browns trying to develop marginal or mid-round picks into our franchise QB." I found this exchange interesting because Brees was a "marginal mid-round pick." He fell to the second round because of questions about his size and arm strength. San Diego drafted Phillip Rivers in the top 10 a couple years later after determining that Brees could not develop into a franchise QB. -- Michael Welday, Akron
Hey, Michael: I don't consider a high second-round pick (Brees) "marginal or mid-round." The final eight playoff teams were led by the following quarterbacks: Brees, second round; Eli Manning, No. 1 overall; Aaron Rodgers, first round; Alex Smith, No. 1 overall; Joe Flacco, first round; Tim Tebow, first round; and Brady, sixth round. Houston had a mid-round rookie playing quarterback (T.J. Yates) because its top two QBs (Matt Schaub, second round; Matt Leinart, first round) were injured.
Hey, Tony: Are the Browns serious in their search for an OC? Or will we most likely hear, "after a long and exhaustive search" we have decided to promote QB coach Mark Whipple (of the LaMonte family)? -- Chris Wheeler, Denver
Hey, Chris: I have not discounted Whipple as a candidate because Pat Shurmur indicated he could choose an offensive coordinator from "inside the building."
Hey, Tony: I am already worried the Browns will trade down or pick defense again in the draft. Would you agree that, if the goal is to win more games sooner rather than later, the Browns must pick elite offensive playmakers early and often? -- Jeff Draime, Warren
Hey, Jeff: I share that opinion but realize there is more than one way to skin a cat.
Hey, Tony: Tony: It seems that right defensive end would be a good hole to plug with a veteran. Do you expect Cliff Avril to be available and, if so, should the Browns be interested? He's young and is a true 4-3 end. How about Robert Mathis? -- Matt Alsip, Towson, Md.
Hey, Matt: Indications are the Lions will re-sign Avril, but we'll have to see. Mathis has been a premier sacker opposite Dwight Freeney on the turf in Indianapolis. He has been criticized for taking too many plays off. I don't see him as a fit here.
Hey, Tony: After the Giants-Packers game Sunday, I was wondering, whatever happened to that obscure NFL rule penalizing teams for a player removing his helmet on the field? At least twice, Giants players doffed their hats -- with no timeouts called -- and no flags. For the sake of the immortal Dwayne Rudd, could you explain the current official indifference to the rule? -- Steve Gaylo, Thompson
Hey, Steve: The helmet rule still is in effect. I'm not aware of the instances you mention, as I was unable to watch the Giants-Packers game. Keep in mind that taking off one's helmet during an official timeout is not a violation.
-- Tony