It's another trip through Tony Grossi's mailbag.
AP photoAnother year of denying Art Modell a chance at the Pro Football Hall of Fame has once again riled up some Baltimore loyalists. Hey, Tony: I hope you are proud of yourself.
Once again Art Modell has no chance of getting in the Hall Of Fame.
You are a little man who has nothing else to do then to keep this man out of the hall, because writing about how bad your teams are is all you have. Are you the only city to lose a team? Hardly. You will suffer decades of misery. You will suffer the next great curse like the Cubs and Red Sox. 86 years. Only 70 good luck. At least you won't be around to see it. -- Mike Cook, Baltimore
Hey, Mike: Forty-four Hall of Fame selectors failed to advance Modell to the semifinalist round of 25. The fine people of Baltimore simply don't understand the process.
Hey, Tony: What were the Browns doing when Brandon Lloyd became available? -- Andy Britton, Venice, Fla.
Hey, Andy: They probably were discouraged from giving up a late draft pick for him because he can be a free agent after the season and they didn't view him as a long-term fit.
Hey, Tony: It's obvious that the Browns are abysmal offensively, for a variety of reasons (injuries, lack of depth and talent and no coordinator). Don't the Browns have a qualified West Coast coordinator on staff, namely Gil Haskell, Holmgren's previous "assistant guru"? To my knowledge he didn't call the plays for him all those years either, so it wouldn't have been that different. It just seems to me like he could've been a significant help to this coach if he'd stepped in and took that position from the beginning, which I'd actually expected him to do. Why didn't he? -- Richard Summers, Shaker Heights
Hey, Richard: Haskell is 68. Who wants to be a full-time NFL assistant coach at that age? Haskell is on the sideline during games. He also is involved during the week. Whoever makes the play calls still has to deal with the lack of playmakers on the Browns.
Hey, Tony: In regards to whether McCoy is the QB of the future, most of the talk has centered around whether there would be someone available in the draft. Is there anyone already in the league that might be worth looking at? One unconventional thought: what about Vince Young? He's still young, he's big and athletic. -- Matthew Moriak, Westerville, Ohio
Hey, Matthew: The other West Coast-type quarterback who comes to mind is Matt Flynn, who is Aaron Rodgers' backup in Green Bay and will get plenty of looks in free agency. Young is more accomplished, but Flynn is highly regarded by some and is reminiscent of Matt Schaub as a backup in Atlanta before given his shot in Houston. Given the Browns' allergic reaction to free agency, I would say neither player is a serious option for them.
Hey, Tony: Could it be possible that the Browns are treating this season as a "throw away" year realizing that they are a couple of drafts away from serious contention? Somehow it wouldn't be as painful to watch them right now if I knew that their goal wasn't so much to win as it is to set the stage for the next couple of years. -- Jerry Rand, Alameda, Calif.
Hey, Jerry: I don't understand why so many people dismiss a 4-6 record as a "throwaway" year. Nobody brought that concept up when Eric Mangini was 1-10 in his first season.
Hey, Tony: I am a lifelong Browns fan now living in the Cincinnati area. One of the most frustrating things for me is that the Browns seemingly showed no interest in the following players -- Manny Lawson, Thomas Howard, Brandon Lloyd, Aaron Curry, Jericho Cotchery and others. These are all examples of relatively young, highly athletic players at positions of need. Why on earth did we not make a serious play for any of them? -- Steve, Cincinnati
Hey, Steve: It seems to me that no matter the regime, the Browns have been extremely lethargic -- or gun-shy -- in adding veteran players both in free agency and in waiver pickups. It's silly to eliminate these avenues as a means of complementing your team. This is 2011 -- not 1981 -- and free agency, especially, can not be ignored by a team with multiple needs.
Hey, Tony: In the west coast offense is it designed to have the fullback sifting through the line and going down field five yards? Is that part of the play? Since they do not throw to the fullback wouldn't he be better staying in the backfield and blocking? -- Ray Dumont, Foley, Ala.
Hey, Ray: There are a lot of things about the West Coast offense I don't understand. The role of the fullback is one of them.
Hey, Tony: Just saw the highlight of Tim Tebow's 20-yard, game-winning run against the Jets. It's clear the Broncos are letting Tim Tebow play to his strengths in the name of winning. Why doesn't Pat Shurmur let go a little bit of his idea of an offense and let Colt get back in the shotgun and toss it around a bit? At least than the other teams defense may not already know what's coming! -- David Johnson, Lorain
Hey, David: In recent weeks, McCoy's plays out of the shotgun formation have increased. If this is the key for him seeing the middle of the field better, I'm all for it.
Joshua Gunter, The Plain DealerEvan Moore hasn't been as productive as many expected this season ... does Tony have a reason? Hey, Tony: During the preseason Evan Moore was said by the coaching staff to be an integral part of the offense for the upcoming season. I'm still waiting for that to happen. He seems to catch everything thrown at him. Has he done something that has put him in disfavor with the coaching staff? -- Bob S, Erie, Pa.
Hey, Bob: I'm told Moore is in the coach's doghouse. I'm not sure all the reasons why, but one-handed attempts at pass catching is definitely one of them.
Hey, Tony: Fill in the blank question: the reason it's so painful to watch the Browns on Sunday is: -- Chris R, San Francisco
Hey, Chris: ... because they don't score enough points to be competitive with the best teams in the league.
Hey, Tony: Mark Sanchez for Alex Mack isn't looking too bad right now. The Browns may have to make a similar decision this year with another USC quarterback, Matt Barkley. -- Joe Carter, Thousand Oaks, Calif.
Hey, Joe: No disrespect to Mack, but Sanchez has won, what, four playoff games on the road in two years and has appeared in two AFC championship games. Mack has accomplished ... ?
Hey, Tony: Had the Browns selected Mark Sanchez a few years ago, would we be debating the quarterback position today? He wouldn't have Alex Mack blocking for him and Mohammed Massaquoi to throw to. Oh, and David Veikune. -- Spike , Tampa, Fla.
Hey, Spike: Sanchez obviously is one of those players Browns fans love to hate.
Hey, Tony: Heard recently your argument against including "specialists" in the HOF. You compared returners like Devin Hester to "the best long snapper, the best coverage linebacker..." as justification. HOF-worthy returners score points way out of proportion to their touching of the ball. Open your mind, Grossi. -- Gary Lazarski, Chicago
Hey, Gary: I would bet you that the best long snapper in history is responsible for more points in his career than Hester will be. Does that make him Hall of Fame-worthy? Of course not. There is a backlog of deserving full-time players whose candidacy must be argued before we get into specialists.
Hey, Tony: I haven't heard or read about the possibility that Andrew Luck could pull a John Elway or Eli Manning. He has one more year of eligibility left at Stanford. He might not be willing to wait behind Peyton Manning. Could this open the door to the Browns or someone else to make a trade? -- Ted Belak, Sierra Madre, Calif.
Hey, Ted: Don't bet on it.
John Kuntz, The Plain DealerHere's a surprise --- it's a Colt McCoy question! Hey, Tony: Both directly and indirectly, you place the majority of blame for the Browns' problems on offense on the QB. Other analysts point out the consistently poor play of the offensive line, the wide receivers and the running backs. You, however, stated the offensive line is just "inconsistent" and barely mention the poor play of the receivers. How do you explain your lack of critical analysis of these three integral parts of the offense and how it significantly hampers any QB's ability to provide positive offense results? -- Dave M., Lawrenceville
Hey, Dave: I remember the same argument made during the careers of Tim Couch, Charlie Frye, Brady Quinn and others since expansion. Do you really think the receivers Tom Brady is throwing to are Pro Bowl caliber? Same with Drew Brees. Does Aaron Rodgers have a stable of all-star receivers, or do they benefit from his pinpoint accuracy and cannon arm? Can you name Green Bay's running backs? Yes, I agree the Browns' receivers are lacking speed to separate from defenders. True, the running backs are off the street because of injuries to Peyton Hillis and Montario Hardesty. The offensive line is working in two young players, but it also has two Pro Bowl players. At some point, doesn't the quarterback have to make plays to elevate those around him? I agree that the position would be easier to play with all-stars all around the quarterback. But if that were the case, couldn't you insert any average quarterback in that cockpit and expect to light up the scoreboard?
Hey, Tony: I don't remember our O-line or Colt McCoy being nearly this bad last year. How much longer is Eric Steinbach under contract for? Do you think he would significantly upgrade our O-line if/when he returns next year? -- Jason DeLong, Morehead City, N.C.
Hey, Jason: I believe Steinbach is under contract for two more years. I think his loss hurt the outside running game in particular because he was so good at pulling and leading sweeps. Of late, the Browns have been working to incorporate Jason Pinkston that way. But he's only a rookie and he played left tackle in college. I believe Steinbach will reclaim his left guard spot next season and Pinkston might be tried at right tackle.
Hey, Tony: Mike Holmgren has been a total disappointment so far. First year, he sticks to a coach everyone knew he was going to fire and this year, he makes no major moves to upgrade the O-line and receivers. How long will Randy Lerner give him to show some progress? -- Joe Reis, Crescent Springs, Ky.
Hey, Joe: Holmgren is under contract through 2014.
Hey, Tony: If the Browns need to get a QB in the 2012 draft we'll need to give up current and future draft picks to move up to get one of the elite QB prospects. That resets any progress we may have made by limiting draft picks for talent around our new QB and means an even less-experienced QB is on the field. Are the Browns -- or should they be -- looking at Matt Flynn from Green Bay in free agency? I would think Flynn in free agency surrounded by top drafted talent may be less risk than another rookie QB surrounded by what we have now. -- Rick, Arkansas
Hey, Rick: Flynn is an interesting option, but is by no means an automatic improvement over McCoy. It would take thorough research to determine if signing him -- no doubt to a large contract -- would solve the franchise quarterback question for the next, say, 5-7 years. The benefit of finding the franchise quarterback in free agency -- or trade -- is it allows the team to use its draft to support the quarterback with playmakers. Of course the same would hold true if McCoy is determined to be the quarterback moving forward. This huge issue must be resolved by Holmgren, and that is one reason why the owner is paying him the big bucks.
Hey, Tony: If the Browns didn't have Phil Dawson, do you think they would try harder (take more chances) to get into the end zone? Three points are better than none, but based on the plays called while in enemy territory, it seems like the Browns are playing for field goals rather than touchdowns. Shore up the right side of the line, get a healthy running back, and a wide receiver and maybe next year will look much brighter. -- D.A. Pimley, Centreville, Va.
Hey, D.A.: I thought the Browns played for field goals more under the former coach than the present one.
Hey, Tony: Why is it so difficult to find the injury report on the Browns page at Cleveland.com? All I wanted to know was who is inactive for the Browns/Jags game. ... I had to go to a different site to find it! -- Eye Dawg, Denver
Hey, Eye: The Browns' inactives are posted on cleveland.com/browns each Sunday as soon as the club announces them.
Hey, Tony: I want to know why some think our D-line is good? We have no depth. The quarterback has all day to throw, leading to easy passes. Then our lineman get thrown around and then every running back has a field day. -- Jay Penn, Cleveland
Hey, Jay: They're young and energetic and they make plays. Are they the 1985 Chicago Bears? No. Are they better than a couple of 30-year-olds who couldn't or wouldn't practice all season last year? Absolutely.
Hey, Tony: Is the coaching staff not really trying to win games? It looks to me like they are actually evaluating the players as if they are playing pre-season. -- Timothy Shinsky, Sheffield Lake
Hey, Timothy: If they are not trying to win, then they are bad at that, too, because they have managed to win four games out of 10. Not great, but better than what we've seen the previous two years. (Oh, yeah, must be the schedule.)
Hey, Tony: Why do you think, even with Ahtyba Rubin, D'Qwell Jackson and the emergence of Phil Taylor, do the Browns still have trouble stopping the run? My guess is that they need better run support from their safeties. -- Chris S, South Euclid
Hey, Chris: I agree. Also, the ends are not good against the run. That might be one reason Jayme Mitchell was demoted.
Hey, Tony: The field at Browns Stadium is terrible. Big chunks of sod go flying on every play and the field is all brown down the middle. What is the scoop on the lousy grass? -- Tom Sudow, Shaker Heights
Hey, Tom: Good question. Seems as if the field always has been underused and still in disrepair.
Hey, Tony: First, I love Joe Haden and hope he remains a Brown forever (representing Cleveland the way he does makes me love him more). Maybe I'm being picky, however, all his "amazing pass breakups" seem to be dropped passes by bad receivers and he throws his hand in there at the last second to make it look like he did something. Am I being too pessimistic? -- Brian W, Erie, Pa.
Hey, Brian: Haden has improved his game over his fine rookie season, except in catching interceptions. I look forward to seeing him compete against A.J. Green, Mike Wallace and whomever Baltimore lines up against him. Yes, I think you're being harsh.
Hey, Tony: Let me get this straight, the NFL police say it is inappropriate for two players to fall to the ground celebrating a touchdown, but it is okay for a visiting player to do a LeBron impersonation? I would call that taunting. -- Gene Lynn, Copley
Hey, Gene: Taunting only is a penalty when it is directed toward the other team, not to a city.
Hey, Tony: The field goal declared no good by Phil Dawson in the Jacksonville game raises a question I have had for many years. Why not raise the uprights another five feet or so? It would seem an easy way to resolve these controversies. P.S. I still say Rich Karlis' kick in the 1986 AFC Championship Game was no good. -- Jonathan Hollingsworth, Independence
Hey, Jonathan: Sounds good to me, as long as it doesn't increase the risk of them snapping in high winds.
Hey, Tony: If Peyton Hillis truly is allowed to walk, do you see the Browns making a run at Michael Bush similar to the Falcons with Michael Turner? I believe he is a free agent after this season and normally I don't agree with spending in free agency, but he's a proven threat and would allow us to focus our draft on WR and OL. Thoughts? -- Vince Ross, Fort Myers, Fla.
Hey, Vince: Bush is a load. He's not in the same class as Turner, however, who had, at the time of his signing, more moves and more speed. Bush also has had some injuries, so I wouldn't invest too heavily in him. Once a running back plays through his rookie contract, you have to be very careful that he hasn't already reached his peak. You want guys like him out of college, not in their second contracts -- for the most part.
-- Tony