No matter how fans try to spin the question, it's (generally) all about Colt.
John Kuntz, The Plain DealerIt's a common defense from McCoy loyalists -- shouldn't the Browns' young QB get a benefit of the doubt from critics because of the lack of offensive support this season? Hey, Tony: As much as I love and support Colt McCoy, wouldn't it make more sense to, I don't know, surround him with playmakers? Look at Chicago. When your KR/PR is your best WR and the only person on the team that seems capable of catching the ball and your O-line is so screwed up your QB is running for his life after every snap, maybe it's not just him? Has anyone ever wondered how Jim Harbaugh has turned Alex Smith around? I thought he was broken beyond repair. -- Eric Cook, Glendale, Ariz.
Hey, Eric: Harbaugh has received efficient production from Smith by emphasizing the team's physical running game and limiting Smith's responsibilities. Smith has the second-fewest pass attempts of any quarterback ranked in the top 20 this season.
Hey, Tony: I have been a Browns fan since the mid '60s and enjoyed the runs the Browns had since then but of course you and I have never seen a Super Bowl victory! Since you would probably be in charge of the Page One story have you ever thought what your headline would say? Come on, let's dream just a little bit. What do you think of "Victory At Last." Give me yours. -- John York, Tampa, Fla.
Hey, John: "Browns Win Super Bowl. Beat Writer Keels Over."
Hey, Tony: Why is it that other teams which face the exact same challenges as the Browns (i.e. new coach, new systems, young players, QB questions, etc.) can rise to be successful and competitive (i.e. S.F., Cincinnati, Buffalo, Oakland, Tennessee) while Cleveland continues to flounder? -- Hoa Pham, Los Angeles
Hey, Hoa: Although the Browns' wins have come against losing (and in two cases, winless) teams, I would submit that a 3-3 record through six games constitutes being competitive. True, the other teams you mention are stronger at this point. But let's see how this season plays out before pulling out the razor blades.
Hey, Tony: I can't believe that I am reading comments that Pat Shurmur is in danger of losing the locker room. I thought the players loved him and even agreed to work on their normal day off after the Miami win. In your opinion, is Shurmur in danger? -- Mike Mahne, Lake Zurich, Ill.
Hey, Mike: No. I don't know where that started.
Hey, Tony: If Colt McCoy neither improves nor regresses, won't it be a bit too early to dismiss him even after one full season? A poorer-performing Sam Bradford is still seen as the franchise quarterback in St. Louis. McCoy's numbers are comparable to many elite quarterbacks' rookie seasons, and West Coast offense timing, well ... it takes time. Even Mike Holmgren said it takes three full years to evaluate a quarterback. Considering it's implausible the Browns will have a shot at Andrew Luck, isn't it likely Colt will be starting over, in competition with, or at worst backing up, whomever the Browns draft? I'm just dreading wasting one of our first-round picks if it turns out McCoy really can be "the man" with more time and better players. And please, no citing arm strength; lately his deep balls have all been overthrown. -- Paul Straub, Orlando, Fla.
Hey, Paul: I think you give a reasonable assessment of the situation. The Browns should have provided McCoy a top-flight receiver this year. My guess is they will not draw conclusions about him until after another year.
John Kuntz, The Plain DealerJoe Haden has some some injury issues, but his play on the field has again been impressive. Hey, Tony: What is the situation with Joe Haden? Five weeks ago, he was telling anyone who'd listen about his plans to be a "top cornerback" in the league. Now it appears he is a great Peyton Hillis impersonator. Half of one season under your belt, always too hurt to play. Come on already. -- Brett Ormsby, Bay Village
Hey, Brett: Wow. You are so far off base, I can only assume you wrote something outrageous simply to see your name in print. Enjoy.
Hey, Tony: I'm sure you get tired of the Hillis questions but ... a few months ago he stated he wasn't worried about his contract because he was sure the Browns would take care of him. He refused to hold out like Chris Johnson and worked through camp. Now Johnson is getting paid and the Browns have made Hillis a villain. In addition to that, the Browns really don't have any depth at the running back position as Montario Hardesty drops everything thrown his way and gets like two yards a carry. Is there any way the front office pays this guy or are they so committed to Hardesty? On top of that, if they actually use him, maybe Colt McCoy doesn't need to throw 40-plus times a game. -- Steve Ritchie, Lima
Hey, Steve: I wouldn't characterize anyone in the contract dispute as a villain. The sides disagree on the value of Hillis. It happens. Rather than choose a side, everyone should just let the business of football run its course. Hillis is under contract through this season. He knows that it behooves everyone -- himself and the Browns -- for him to make the most of the remaining 10 games.
Hey, Tony: Can you please tell me why Jim Ray Smith is not in the Hall of Fame? After all, Jim Brown did not get those 5.2 yards per carry on his own. -- Joe Doran, Concord, N.C.
Hey, Joe: I can't answer why Smith isn't in the Hall of Fame. His name has never been presented in the 17 years I have served on the selection committee. I do know that most former Browns consider Smith one of the most deserving players for Hall consideration.
Hey, Tony: I'm truly not asking this to stir anything up, but I am wondering what the possibility of Mike Holmgren ever being the coach of the Browns might be. Especially if the Browns got a really great young QB that he would like to work with, or were close enough to getting to a Super Bowl and needed that last push over the hump. How much of a thought is that in the back of his mind, do you think? -- Eric Myers, Victoria, Minn.
Hey, Eric: Holmgren did consider taking the coaching job after he decided to not bring back Eric Mangini. After talking it over with his wife, he decided he didn't have the energy to put in the long hours required. Although he admits he misses coaching, he recently told a Seattle radio station he will never coach again. Most people I talk to in the league agree that Holmgren has the best job in all of football. Why would he give it up to return to the daily grind of coaching?
Hey, Tony: Why all the panic? The Browns are a couple of breakdowns away from a 3-2 or possibly 4-1 record. That is not to say that I think the Browns have the talent to win consistently now, but any time you change a coach and subsequently your offensive/defensive systems it will take time for the front office to acquire the correct talent to run the systems and then it takes time for the players to learn and assimilate the information so they can run the systems well. Fans need to exercise some patience and trust that Holmgren and Heckert have the team's best interests in mind when they make decisions. -- Duane Showalter, Fox Lake, Wis.
Hey, Duane: Browns GM Tom Heckert said on a radio interview this week that he believes the team is "close" to joining the ranks of contender.
Hey, Tony: If the NFL decides to keep this ridiculous kickoff rule in place for future years, do you see teams using a spot on their roster just for a kicker who can kick it out of the end zone and negate the returns of, say, a Josh Cribbs? This may create jobs for some soccer players. --Jeff Hall, Fremont.
Hey, Jeff: I agree. It makes more sense to carry a kickoff specialist than a kamikaze-type tackler on kickoffs. A player like Nick Sorensen was rendered obsolete by the kickoff rule.
Hey, Tony: I was taught to have patience growing up. Because of this I am perfectly suited to being a Browns fan. Which would you rather see from the 2012 draft? Use the draft picks we have on defensive playmakers? Most specifically linebackers to help D'Qwell Jackson and a partner for Joe Haden. Or, trade whatever we can for Andrew Luck? My opinion would be defense. -- Matthew Loar, Muncie, Ind.
Hey, Matthew: My opinion is the Browns will not join the ranks of elite teams without an elite quarterback. Luck is an elite QB prospect.
Hey, Tony: When the Browns move to London in 2017 will they take the name and colors? -- Darius, Rittman.
Hey, Darius: Oh, please.
Hey, Tony: Just for chuckles, let's assume that the Browns have a shot at the "Luck of the draw" and you are Andrew Luck. Do you accept the fate of previous Browns franchise draftees, i.e. Couch, Frye, maybe McCoy (Kosar doesn't count), or do you pull an Eli Manning? The only team I can think of with worse experience is the Bungles with David Klingler and Akili Smith (to name just two). -- Bob Joyce, Springfield, Ohio
Hey, Bob: You do know that Luck's father, Oliver, grew up in Cleveland, don't you? Luck has the option of returning to Stanford for his final year of eligibility.
Hey, Tony: My son was one of the guys carrying a flag [at a Browns game]. Is there any way you could please tell me how I can get some of those pictures? He is a Parma firefighter and we are proud of it. -- Marylou Hriczik, Strongsville
Hey, Marylou: I would think the Browns take photographs of their pre-game and National Anthem ceremonies. Contact the Browns and see if they could help.
Hey, Tony: Let me see if I understand this: The 2011 draft day trade was ill-advised because the Browns would be much better off with a stud wide receiver. Instead they have two stud defensive linemen and an extra first rounder next year. Now you say there should be no hesitancy in trading 2012's two first rounders, plus 2013's first rounder and a mid-round pick (mortgaging the future), to take a chance on a QB who may turn out to be another Ryan Leaf. Even though we would be unable to make that trade without making the trade last April, we would still have no stud wide receiver for the franchise QB! I need to step away from the computer because this makes no sense. -- George Amer, Gallatin, Tenn.
Hey, George: Two "stud" defensive linemen is your opinion. Jabaal Sheard represents the Browns' original second-round pick. The second-round pick obtained in the Atlanta trade is Greg Little. As for the possibility of Andrew Luck turning out to be another Ryan Leaf, a little background on both players would easily show how wrong that comment is. Anyone who shares the opinion that the Browns aren't going anywhere without an elite quarterback would trade the future picks for Luck. Look what happened to the New York Giants after they made a similar trade with San Diego for Eli Manning. The Chargers haven't won anything with all the picks they received and the Giants have one Super Bowl title and Manning keeps them in contention for more.
Lynne Sladky, Associated PressAndrew Luck will be the backstory this season for every NFL team that decides it needs a quarterback ... and plenty of Browns fans have already come to that conclusion with their favorite team. Hey, Tony: Can a fact-based case be made that Stanford QB Andrew Luck won't turn out to be the next Todd Blackledge? I'd contend that a lot (not all) of a QB's success or failure depends on the tools around him, and right now the Browns are working with an empty toolbox for any QB, Colt McCoy or anyone else. -- Tim, Winter Haven, Fla.
Hey, Tim: You have the right to defend McCoy, if you choose. I'm just of the opinion that Luck is the real deal, the truth, the consensus-best QB prospect since Peyton Manning, a QB in the class of John Elway. If you share that opinion, you do everything possible to acquire him. That doesn't mean giving up your entire next two drafts. I think quality players can still be found after the first round to continue building the rest of the team. By the way, the reference to Blackledge just doesn't wash.
Hey, Tony: Phil Dawson's game-winning kicks got me to wondering -- why haven't the Browns signed him to a new contract? They can't franchise tag him again, can they? -- Jimmy Brock, Berkeley, Calif.
Hey, Jimmy: Yes, the Browns could franchise Dawson again in 2012. I think that's more likely a possibility than a multi-year contract.
Hey, Tony: Yes, Andy Dalton, Cam Newton, Joe Flacco, Matt Ryan, Big Ben, etc. have all made instant impacts in the NFL. However, the vast majority (and then some) of young QBs struggle. In fact, the Hall of Fame is lined with guys that took years to develop. I get so frustrated when people imply that we will know what we have in Colt McCoy by the end of the season. What's the bigger risk? Sticking with McCoy for more than 24 games? Or spending another high pick on another quarterback? -- Rob Keel, Oak Hill, W.Va.
Hey, Rob: You raise intelligent questions. I'm not about to give up on McCoy after a very sluggish start to his first season as the starting quarterback. I do believe, however, that we will be able to tell if he has "it" by the end of this season. True, there are myriad examples of quarterbacks who develop later in their careers and take teams to the Super Bowl. Those quarterbacks wound up in the right situation at the right time. As things are shaping up, it will be a difficult call for the Browns to make on their quarterback situation. McCoy has plenty of time to make that call easier.
Hey, Tony: Many Browns fans were hoping that the O Line with the return of a healthy Tony Pashos would be a team strength, but early injuries to starters and now backups has dashed them. Could Hillis' reluctance to sign an extension be driven by reaction to what all hoped would be a breakout year for the whole O Line? -- Alan Fojt, Manassas, Va.
Hey, Alan: No. I believe Hillis' reluctance to sign is simply a matter of a huge disagreement over what he is worth.
Hey, Tony: Any win normally would make me happy, but Seattle was out their starting QB and their starting RB and we simply won because of a bad call by the refs on a block in the back. The WCO was supposed to not be conservative but we ran the ball three times (even you said they would not play for field goals). Can you tell me why they got rid of Mangini when this was his style anyway? Colt wouldn't have to learn another offense and be considered a rookie if Holmgren left things alone. -- Rick DelPrado, Middletown, Conn.
Hey, Rick: Your Connecticut address blows your cover as a Mangini fan. I am not going to get into a rehash of his two years as coach. He did his best and Holmgren decided to make a change. I happened to agree. We can waste time and energy debating this topic or move on. I choose the latter.
Hey, Tony: How does Phil Dawson's field goal percentage compare to that of opposing kickers in Browns Stadium? -- Chadrick McNeal, Elida, Ohio
Hey, Chadrick: Your question would take a great deal of research to answer. I may pursue it because I suspect Dawson's percentage at home is a lot better than opposing kickers. I liken Dawson to Matt Bahr, who had better numbers in the kicker's graveyard known as Municipal Stadium than on the road. I know it's heresy, but Dawson in my opinion is the greatest kicker in Browns history. Kickers are bigger, stronger and more accurate than at any time in NFL history.
Hey, Tony: 1) Everyone seems to be hitting on QBs in recent drafts. Why does it seem like we cannot hit on a stud QB after all these drafts, or at least one that gives us a chance to win for that matter. When will it be our turn? 2) Just curious, can I get an update on fourth-round pick Jordan Cameron? Haven't heard his name since draft day. -- Jake Brown, Baltimore, Md.
Hey, Jake: 1. It's the key to the team ever winning anything again. 2. Cameron was active last week for the first time. He's a developmental player at a position at which the Browns have good depth.
AP photoYes, the QB debate in Cleveland could be more agitated --- if it involved Tim Tebow. Hey, Tony: I think your comment in Sunday's PD predicting how Christians would react to Tim Tebow scoring a TD was very inappropriate. If Tim Tebow was a devout Catholic I doubt if you would have said something like: "Communion being passed out in the stands." I think there are a lot of subjects you could ridicule how about leaving Christians alone. -- Bob Gross, Garfield Heights.
Hey, Bob: I apologize to anyone who was offended. I didn't say how Christians would react. I said how Tebow fans would react. You are making the generalization that only Christians follow Tebow. I think that is very inappropriate.
Hey, Tony: I agree that you need a good quarterback to be a playoff team and hopefully a Super Bowl winner. I love Colt McCoy's intangibles but his arm strength does cause concern. You definitely get a different feeling watching players like Rodgers, Brady, Stafford and Ryan standing tall in the pocket and throwing passes downfield with zip on them. I don't think Luck will be obtainable, so the question is do you take a highly-rated quarterback like Barkley or Jones or use your own probable high pick to get a good receiver like South Carolina's Alshon Jeffery or Oklahoma State's Justin Blackmon? Do you stay with Colt and hope a better supporting cast, including a better line, and a full year's experience, will make a difference? -- Paul Naudain, Portland, Ore.
Hey, Paul: Your analysis is reasonable. I sincerely doubt that McCoy would be displaced by any quarterback in the draft not named Andrew Luck. I agree it's unlikely the Browns make a move for him. Thus, I can easily see the Browns seeking to support McCoy in the off-season and loading up on offense in the draft.
Hey, Tony: Why would the Browns wait a full 16-game season to evaluate McCoy? I like the man but as some may know, the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expect different results. Soft schedule, and no week-to-week improvement, just static if not downward trend in the QB position is what we see. Second, why do you think they got rid of Brad Seely after two years of building a league-leading special teams unit? -- Doug Furtado, Vermillion
Hey, Doug: 1. You can't evaluate McCoy based on anything less than a full season. 2. Seely left on his own to join the 49ers. I think he felt loyalty to Eric Mangini and didn't feel comfortable staying.
Hey, Tony: Since Colt McCoy is not a significant part of the offense, will he start covering kick and punt returns? -- Burt Pickles, Franklintown
Hey, Burt: Nice try on the takeoff on Josh Cribbs' post-Oakland game comments. But McCoy is the single most significant part of the offense, for good or for bad.
Hey, Tony: What's up with the special teams? They arguably cost us the Raiders game and nearly cost us the Seahawks game. We've seen more breakdowns in the past two games than Brad Seely's entire tenure here! -- Craig DeLapp, Huron
Hey, Craig: The team youth movement broke up the core of veterans Seely had collected to make his special teams highly ranked.
Hey, Tony: Amid all of the back and forth on Peyton Hillis contract situation, not much has been written about Phil Dawson's long-term future. Is there any chance he's with the team next year or do you think he'll be looking for a near-term Super Bowl contender? -- Joe Jirgal, Westlake
Hey, Joe: Unless the Browns use the franchise tag again on Dawson, I see him leaving via free agency.
Hey, Tony: Since I do not see the Browns often on TV (I'm stuck in the Dallas market), I have to rely on the PD reporting. Six games into the season and I would like to know where you see the Browns improving (players, coaches, and management). Also, who, exactly, is playing well enough for the Browns and who is coaching well enough for the Browns to warrant kudos? Conversely, what are the major disappointments? Lastly, has the Hillis strep-throat situation and ongoing contract drama had an adverse impact on the players and coaches? -- Jim Albertson, Norman, Okla.
Hey, Jim: Briefly, the Browns are better on the defensive line, in the secondary, and, yes, at receiver (with Greg Little). I believe their overall coaching staff is good. Dick Jauron and Ray Rhodes were excellent additions on defense. The disappointments center on the offense -- overall lack of production, inconsistency on the offensive line, a breakdown in the running game and subsequent unproductive play at quarterback. Keep in mind the new offensive system is only six games old. As for the Hillis soap opera, his mind obviously has been affected by the melodrama. The running game in general also has suffered.
Hey, Tony: First off its is too early for fans to think that Mangini was better than Shurmur seeing how Mangini was 5-11 two years straight and had previous head coaching experience while this is Shurmur's first time as head coach and the team is at 3-3. Most of it is the defense and the running game missing Vickers and Steinbach. I say let the final record tell the story. How much is the play of the right side of the O-line contributing to our woes on offense, do you think it will be improved next season if Steinbach comes back healthy? -- Raymond Amador, Lorain
Hey, Raymond: I, for one, underestimated the loss of Steinbach. Without him, the Browns' running game has become one-dimensional and predictable. The team can't get its backs to the perimeter, to which Steinbach was so good at pulling. The only way to develop young linemen is to play them. The growing pains felt by playing Pinkston and Shawn Lauvao should pay off. When? I don't know.
Hey, Tony: I've heard multiple times it would take three number-one picks to get Andrew Luck. Besides the Browns and Bengals, are there any other teams with the ammo to put together a package to acquire the 2012 number one pick? -- Jim Bolko, Vallejo, Calif.
Hey, Jim: New England always has multiple picks in the first three rounds.
Hey, Tony: Is it that Colt McCoy can't find receivers downfield, doesn't have time to throw longer or is Shurmur Mr. Dink and Dunk to the max? -- Jim Kippen, Plymouth Meeting, Pa.
Hey, Jim: I would say the first two points are more at play here.
Hey, Tony: After listening to Mike Holmgren's comments about hiring an offensive coordinator next year but still having Shurmur call the plays, I have to ask: Why would an elite offensive coordinator want to come here if he does not have the ability to call his own plays? Is this something normally done in the NFL? -- Jeffrey Vilk, Madison, Ohio.
Hey, Jeffrey: This is exactly why a coordinator wasn't hired in the first place. Shurmur interviewed at least three candidates and all three declined to come without the authority to call plays. There are many examples of the head coach calling his own plays despite having a coordinator (in title only). Currently, these include Sean Payton of New Orleans, Gary Kubiak of Houston, Jason Garrett of Dallas, Mike McCarthy of Green Bay and Ken Whisenhunt of Arizona. Other head coaches who did similarly, at one time or another, were Mike Holmgren, Andy Reid, Bill Walsh, Mike Shanahan.
Hey, Tony: If a team that has a good established quarterback wins the Andrew Luck contest and is drafting No. 1, how likely is it for them to draft him? Is it a good idea to draft a talented QB as a backup? It worked with Green Bay. Specifically what do you think Indy or the St. Louis Rams would do with the top choice? -- Elliott Amstutz, Galva, Kan.
Hey, Elliott: My hunch is that Indy would draft Luck, but the Rams might consider trading the pick or Sam Bradford.
Hey, Tony: The "Gods of Professional Football, Cleveland Browns Chapter" seem to be having a burst of humor at the current management's expense. The prior regime wanted a tough and stingy defense, run, run, run the ball and a game-manager QB. The current regime has a very different philosophy especially on offense. What the Browns seem to have is the previous regime's fondest dreams on defense. -- Wayne Hopewell, Colorado City, Colo.
Hey, Wayne: I think Pat Shurmur wants to get from Point A to Point D on offense without first touching on Points B and C. I think he overloaded Colt McCoy from the beginning and should have, in retrospect, taken the offense along more slowly. That is, should have stuck more with what the Browns were capable of doing and develop over time. Now I think they are in the process of shifting back to that thinking.
Hey, Tony: Why is Carlton Mitchell not on the field? Brian Robiskie is not doing anything, we need a receiver who can separate from the DBs. Second, where do I send my resume for the special teams coach? -- Tom French, North Myrtle Beach, S.C.
Hey, Tom: Mitchell's legions of fans should get their wish and see him on the field Sunday in Candlestick Park.
Hey, Tony: With the upgraded contracts the Browns have handed out to Joe Thomas, Ahtyba Rubin, Josh Cribbs, Chris Gocong and Evan Moore are they planning on extending D'Qwell Jackson? -- Jerry Rand, Alameda, Calif.
Hey, Jerry: Jackson's uncertain contract status has been overshadowed by that of Peyton Hillis. My guess is the Browns will wait as long as they can on Jackson to make sure he holds up physically. I think they do want to tie him up before the season is over.
Hey, Tony: Pass plays requiring Colt McCoy to roll out to his left are virtually non-existent. When Colt attempts to elude pressure, he rarely scrambles to his left. The opposing defensive coordinators surely are aware of these tendencies and must strategize accordingly. Are my observations valid? -- Robert Patalita, West Milford, N.J.
Hey, Robert: Absolutely. First off, it's a difficult play for a right-handed QB to roll left and put the ball on the money. The solution is to create a pocket, stay in it, and scan the entire field.
Hey, Tony: Do you think Peyton Manning will get any MVP votes this year? Is there any one player who has proven to be more vital to his team's success? -- Ted Belak, Sierra Madre, Calif.
Hey, Ted: I've voted for Manning when he plays. He didn't need neck surgery to prove how valuable he is.
Hey, Tony: I keep hearing/reading where if the Browns don't sign Hillis to a contract pretty soon that he will walk at the end of the year. Can't they keep him by using the franchise tag, which they won't (too much money) or by using the transition tag where he could solicit offers and they could match or let him go for a draft pick? -- John J. Berezo, Culloden, W.Va.
Hey, John: Both of those options are available, but the one-year guaranteed salary they would cost is way more than the Browns think Hillis is worth.
-- Tony