The contracts signed by top running backs such as Chris Johnson, Adrian Peterson, Frank Gore and DeAngelo Williams momentarily lifted Hillis' boat. It's smart for the Browns to let the tide ebb.
Michael Conroy, Associated PressPeyton Hillis is a fan favorite but are the Browns willing to pay him big bucks?
Three weeks ago, team President Mike Holmgren told ESPN the Browns were "trying like crazy" to get running back Peyton Hillis under contract "for a long time."
By that, I think he meant the Browns weren't trying like crazy to get Hillis under contract for a long time. Circumstances, after all, favor the team.
Unless Hillis' demands are atypically modest for running backs looking to cash in, there's no rush.
Holmgren wouldn't be the first team executive to tell fans what they want to hear while adopting a much more conservative stance privately. In John Hart's time with the Indians, he was consistently "kicking the tires" on top free-agent pitchers, yet never driving one off the lot.
There's nothing wrong with that. In fact, it wouldn't be wise for Holmgren to say anything else publicly or do anything rash in negotiations so early in a season framed by so many unknowns.
The contracts signed by top running backs such as Chris Johnson, Adrian Peterson, Frank Gore and DeAngelo Williams momentarily lifted Hillis' boat. It's smart for the Browns to let the tide ebb.
First of all, he's no Peterson and Johnson. Secondly, Peterson and Johnson are no Peterson and Johnson.
Johnson, who comes to town with the Tennessee Titans Sunday, is last in the league in yards per carry (2.1) among running backs with more than 25 carries. Statistically, he went from most underpaid to (temporarily) most overpaid in three short weeks.
In Minnesota, Peterson's father was quoted as calling his son "the league's highest-paid decoy." Carolina's Williams is next to last. Third from the bottom is Gore, rewarded this summer by the 49ers.
Three games is hardly a sample. The struggles are more symbolic of how running backs are dependent on offensive philosophies, good health, top offensive lines and other factors.
You can't blame productive NFL backs for trying to cash in at the end of their rookie contracts. They know better than anyone how much punishment they take and how the miles add up.
Hillis' idea of making tacklers miss last season was vaulting them. There are inherent risks in hurdling tacklers that make taking shots straight on safe by comparison.
Meanwhile, it's not a good time to be him. Despite his great work last year, the Browns won just a handful of games. Count the running backs in 2010 who had great (and losing) seasons.
The passing game is trumping the run, and not only where the West Coast offense operates. No doubt, Hillis' receiving ability makes him a good fit here. He's not one-dimensional, at least in that sense.
It's just this particular WCO is in its infancy, with a new head coach using the 2011 season to evaluate his personnel. One of those players is running back Montario Hardesty.
So in his contract year, Hillis figures to get fewer carries. Twice already this season (once while Hillis was sidelined), Colt McCoy threw 40 and 39 times, respectively.
Hardesty looked good against Miami Sunday. And fast. And healthy (for now).
Off that performance, the Browns can easily justify using him even more, if only to keep Hillis fresh. The byproduct of that arrangement would be to tilt even more leverage the Browns' way in contract negotiations.
Beyond all the statistical evidence indicating that long-term deals for running backs are risky business, Hillis' hopes of getting a top contract face another obstacle.
If Hardesty is as good as the Browns think he can be, the guy who owns the town and Madden cover could find himself in a time-share that ostensibly helps the team on the field but also in the negotiating room.
He said it
"I was being too candid." -- Michael Vick, "apologizing" for saying refs are allowing too many late hits on him.
(Translation: Did I say your butt looks big in those jeans? Sorry. What I mean to say is it does.)
Spinoffs
NCAA President Mark Emmert says the game of musical chairs among big-time football schools has left the impression that college sports is being driven by money. Nah. That couldn't be it.
"How many times have you read that in the past 10 days alone?" Emmert asked an assembly of athletic directors. "I didn't read about many of us stepping up and saying, 'Well, you know, this will actually work really well for student-athletes because . . . it'll help us stabilize our programs.' "
Yes. Especially those minor sports student-athletes now traveling a couple of thousand miles for a Tuesday volleyball game.
Said Syracuse coach Jim Boeheim: "If conference commissioners were the Founding Fathers of this country, we would have Guatemala, Uruguay and Argentina in the United States. This audience knows why we are doing this. There's two reasons: Money and football."
So, see, Emmert has a point. It's not just the money. It's also about football.
Bengals' running back Cedric Benson's case that he shouldn't be suspended for an incident that happened during the lockout makes sense on the surface. The players weren't employed by the NFL and were ostracized to the point that they couldn't rehab injuries at team facilities.
But Benson's stance isn't helped by Terrelle Pryor and Jim Tressel getting suspended for something that happened pre-NFL.
And all that will pale when NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell gets around to suspending a player -- probably Steelers linebacker James Harrison -- for excessive kicking in utero.
Two reporters from competing Philadelphia newspapers got into a physical altercation at the Eagles team facility Wednesday, leading one Philadelphia area website reader to comment: "They got more fight in them than the Eagles do."
You said it
"Hey, Bud: May I be the first to predict that this year's Super Bowl will be a rematch of The Great Lakes Classic?" -- Pat
Yes. And the last.
"Hey, Bud: Rumor has it we will have to pay a fee to be on Facebook. Are we going to have to pay a fee soon to get in your column?" -- Doug, Westlake
No. The price in lost dignity is already steep enough.
"Bud: The 'Spin' has let its readers write your columns for some time now. You have inspired me to pen my own novel. When can you deliver the manuscript?" -- Jim Lefkowitz
Soon. It's the story of a Cleveland sportswriter who revolutionizes the use of the semicolon. It goes without saying; I'll be played by Fabio; in the movie version.
"Hey, Bud: Ever wonder why everyone always says you're 'preaching to the choir?' Shouldn't it be your 'preaching to the converted,' or your 'singing to the choir?' Or, 'I was walking on eggshells.' Shouldn't it be, 'I was walking on eggs'?" -- Devin, Euclid
For some odd reason, I heard your email in the voice of Andy Rooney.
"Bud: What conclusions do you draw when Bengals' players are caught with 14 pounds of marijuana and yet they catch the Browns napping?" -- Michael Sarro
That maybe it's true what they say about secondhand smoke?
"Hey, Bud: Is [Jim] Thome's new statue on rollers?" -- Bill Weekley
First-time "You said it" winners receive a T-shirt from the mental-floss collection. Repeat winners receive "Jim Thome's Guide to Philadelphia, Chicago, Los Angeles and Minneapolis."