The fans' ongoing debate over the Browns' receiving corps remains one of the constants in each week's mailbag for beat writer Tony Grossi.
Hey, Tony: I came home from work today to find out that the Ravens acquired Lee Evans from Buffalo for a fourth-round pick. How do the Browns not manage to make similarly low-priced acquisitions? Is it something about those players not wanting to play in Cleveland, or do the Browns somehow not think 1,000-yard receivers are worth a fourth-round pick? -- Dan Christler, Olmsted Township
Hey, Dan: I am at a loss to explain the Browns' non-interest in Evans, other than to reiterate their claim that they are satisfied with their receivers.
Hey, Tony: 1. Do you think with the current rules in place there will be a single kick return for a touchdown (barring fluke plays)? 2. Do you think the Browns aren't paying much attention to special teams in comparison to the previous regime because of these new rules making it nearly impossible to return one to the house? -- Kyle Chormanski, Los Angeles
Hey, Kyle: 1. There may be a 109-yard kickoff return because returners will be more apt to run everything out. But there will be far fewer return TDs as a result of the new rules. 2. The previous regime was obsessed with special teams and devoted more attention to them. The current coaching staff spends more time on offense and defense, which is good.
Hey, Tony: Any chance the Browns buy low and provide some defensive depth with another FA or two? For pennies on the dollar wouldn't Kirk Morrison be solid insurance at MLB? Doesn't it make more sense to bring a few guys in now, at the risk of hurting someone's feelings, instead of waiting for final roster cuts? -- Bryan G, Delaware, Ohio
Hey, Bryan: The non-existent minicamp season robbed teams of assessing their younger players. So I think many teams, not just the Browns, are staying with younger players longer in preseason to fully evaluate what they have on hand. I think the Browns will add a veteran player, or two, after the final roster cuts. But remember that veterans who are on a roster on the season's first week are guaranteed their base salary for the year. So what happens is teams wait until the second week of the season to pick up some veterans.
Hey, Tony: Does the success of the Paul Brown offense of the '50s really translate into a projection of success for the West Coast offense in Cleveland now? Don't forget that the weather the Browns now face is much more severe than in those days. During Paul Brown's career with the 12-game schedule, the season generally ended on the third Sunday of December, followed by only one postseason game. Also schedule-makers generally put snow-belt teams like the Browns and Packers on the road the last two, or sometimes even three weeks. I specifically remember one season when the last home game was in November. Otto Graham was great, but he almost never had to face the conditions the Browns deal with week after week in December and January. -- Norman Cox, Indianapolis, Ind.
Hey, Norman: What about global warming?
Hey, Tony: I was wondering if you saw Julio Jones first preseason game? My question is do you really think Heckert would have drafted Julio Jones at number 6? I know you have been against the trade and felt we should have taken Jones, but I think Heckert would have taken D-line no matter what, just felt the quality was deep enough to fall 15 picks. Your take? -- Levi Mendenhall, Springfield
Hey, Levi: Obviously Heckert did not want to take a receiver. I have not seen Jones play in a preseason game. My sources say he has been "phenomenal" in the Falcons' camp.
Hey, Tony: Maybe it's me. The Browns look fresh and invigorated. This team looks like new air. What say you ? -- Sherman Flakes, Akron
Hey, Sherman: Young and hungry.
Hey, Tony: After watching the game against Green Bay, I notice the Browns have trouble covering the Packers' receivers. Do you see this as a problem, or is because they haven't practice enough? -- Donald Pasqualetti, Reading
Hey, Donald: I believe everybody had trouble covering Green Bay receivers last year.
Hey, Tony: I was wondering why the Browns haven't made a move for Asante Samuel. He sounds as if he isn't happy in Philly and along with Joe Haden it gives the Browns a much-improved pass defense. Second, much as I think Terrelle Pryor is immature and probably not QB material, I think he would fit in the west coast offense nicely as a WR. For what would amount to a fourth-round pick we get a possible QB and a utility WR. Seems win-win. -- Steven Ritchie, Lima
Hey, Steven: Trading for Samuel doesn't make sense to me. I think the Browns should concentrate on developing young cornerbacks. As for Terrelle Pryor, I would pass, thank you.
Hey, Tony: I am always interested in the "palace intrigue" of the Browns. How would you describe the difference with Holmgrem/Heckert this year compared with last year? Is Holmgren more involved or engaged with Shurmur than with Mangini? Was the Holmgren/Mangini relationship non-existent or was it based solely on wins and losses? -- Cuyler Hunter, Columbus
Hey, Cuyler: Holmgren has done more coaching in the first two weeks of training camp than he did all of last year. There's no doubt the chemistry in the building is better now.
Hey, Tony: Andrew Luck was a lock for the first pick this year. Won't he make less money next year with the new agreement? Would he rather play in Cincinnati or Buffalo over Carolina? I am sure he is a smart guy, but what is he thinking? -- George Maris, Villa, Ky.
Hey, George: The new agreement kicked in this year, so it didn't matter that Luck elected to return to Stanford. If he had come out, he would be subject to the same reduction in rookie contracts. He wanted to enjoy his final year of college. What's wrong with that?
Hey, Tony: Will Jeff Wolfert have a shot at beating out Phil Dawson? At 25 he could be the Browns' kicker for the next ten years and Dawson will probably be gone for 2012. -- Tom Thomas, Fla.
Hey Tom: Incredible. Next.
Hey, Tony: Thank goodness for the Internet or I would never know what is going on with the Browns. As much as I enjoy reading your reports as well as Mary Kay's, I grow increasingly weary of what I interpret as negative reporting on Colt McCoy. I hear much about his lack of arm strength, but if arm strength was a key to success, then Jeff George and JaMarcus Russell would be enshrined in the Hall of Fame (Russell albeit prematurely). Heck, even Vince Young's physical abilities exceed McCoy's and look what a head case he turned out to be.
There comes a time when you have to measure what is inside a player and I think what is inside McCoy is the same thing that was inside Brian Sipe and Bernie Kosar: A desire to win. I am an OU Sooner fan who watched McCoy and the Longhorns beat the Sooners two out of three games in Dallas. I have not changed my tune. When will you change your tune on Colt McCoy? -- Jim Albertson, Norman, Okla.
Hey, Jim: I don't apologize for questioning McCoy's arm strength. He has everything else you want in a quarterback. I would have less concern if McCoy played in a dome or warm weather city. Arm strength alone does not make a quarterback great, of course. But it does matter when playing in Cleveland or Buffalo in December. Montana played in San Francisco. Big difference. Sipe was a marvelous, iconic Cleveland sports figure who never won a playoff game. Kosar's arm was above-average until his elbow injury in 1988. I don't doubt that McCoy can succeed in the West Coast offense. Perhaps the system can compensate for his arm. But in January, with all the chips on the line, he will have to make a play with his arm. I hope that he can make that play.
Hey, Tony: One pre-season game doesn't make a contender, but something that really encouraged me in the opener were the receivers. I'm not trying to take anything away from Colt McCoy, but it was refreshing to see Little, Watson and Cribbs catching the ball away from their bodies, and adjusting to where the ball was in the air. Does McCoy throw a more catchable ball? Secondly: Is it just me or does Seneca Wallace throw a very questionable deep ball? No touch, no timing, just sort of heaved up there, maybe in bounds, maybe not. -- Doug Shaffer, Orange, Calif.
Hey, Doug: It's amazing what a professional offensive system can do for everybody on offense. I agree with your assessment of Wallace.
Hey, Tony: 1) Pat Shurmur seems must more approachable and willing to answer questions during press conferences (plus he seems like a nice guy). It's refreshing to see after years of secrets, secrets, and more secrets. What are your thoughts from a reporter's perspective on Shurmur?
2) You're the expert here who sees him every day, so I'm asking what your impression is of McCoy. Please don't say "well it depends on x, y, and z" or "only time will tell." Just looking for your gut feeling after doing this for so many years. In your opinion, is he the long-term solution? Why or why not? -- Mitch Weiss, Tallahassee, Fla.
Hey, Mitch: Shurmur's off to a good start. He seems like a normal person who happens to be a football coach. No hidden agendas. As for McCoy, I feel we'll all be able to tell by the end of this year if he is the long-term solution.
Hey, Tony: This coaching staff has to see that Sheldon Brown is a liability at CB. Why don't they stop this charade and move him to safety? -- Mike B, Dover
Hey, Mike: Very harsh judgment on a very solid player.
Hey, Tony: Watching the game against GB, I can see why people are high on Jordan Norwood. He looks like he brings something to the table that none of the other receivers possess: explosiveness. Do you think he'll make the roster this year? -- Keith, Cleveland
Hey, Keith: Barring something unforeseen, I expect Norwood to open the season as the No. 1 slot receiver, though he doesn't have the position locked up. He's got the right shiftiness and quickness to avoid contact in the middle of the field.
Hey, Tony: Since Joe Haden is our shutdown corner, why doesn't he always cover the opposing team's No. 1 receiver? -- Justin Sack, Phoenix, Ariz.
Hey, Justin: Like the majority of teams, the Browns prefer to assign their cornerbacks left and right.
Hey, Tony: From players comments it sounds to me like they have a lot more confidence in Shurmur. Is that the feel you get or is it a matter of them knowing which side of the bread is buttered? The offense already looks better this year than it did all of last year. Do you find it refreshing that they're not rushing on every first and second down? -- Glenn Studevant, Tucson, Ariz.
Hey, Glenn: Everything about the new offense is refreshing. I would even expect the Browns to throw into the end zone on occasion this year instead of dumping the ball inside the 10 and hoping for the best. (Sarcasm.)
Hey, Tony: One of the negatives I read about Colt McCoy is the question of his ability to throw the long ball. If you look up highlights on YouTube, you can see Colt at Texas completing passes from 50 to 60 yards with fairly good accuracy. How far does he have to throw the ball for it to be considered the long ball or am I totally missing the point? -- Greg Dineen, Middletown
Hey, Greg: Yes, highlights are fun to watch. It's not so much the distance, it's the torque on the ball, being able to get the ball on target and on time. Does it float to its target or does it spin? McCoy said after his first season that he suffered a tired arm at times late in the year due to his shoulder injury in his last college game. So we'll see this year in December how well his throws are spinning.
Hey, Tony: I heard Mike Holmgren talking recently on TV about teaching this young team about the legacy of some great Browns teams of the past. Can you deliver a message to Mr. Holmgren for me and thousands of other die-hard fans? The message is that number 57 belongs to a revered and Hall of Fame-caliber linebacker, Clay Matthews. Those of us that are truly aware of the Browns legacy cannot stand to see anyone wearing number 57 miss an open-field tackle like Eric Gordon did last week. Furthermore, I was personally offended last year to see David Veikune wearing number 57. Sign Clay Matthews Jr. someday and let him wear that number. Otherwise let's take it out of circulation for a while. -- John Davis, Brunswick Hills
Hey, John: Yes, it would have been nice to draft Matthews' son in 2009 and give him his father's No. 57. Instead it went to Veikune. That in itself is a metaphor for the franchise's recent woes.
Hey, Tony: Have you heard if the Browns have any interest in Lofa Tatupu? -- Sean Frias, Wayne
Hey, Sean: No.
Hey, Tony: What happens if Terrell Pryor or any of the other players entered into the supplemental draft are not picked? Are they considered undrafted free agents and allowed to sign with any team? If so, why waste a draft pick? Why not just sign him after the draft? -- Jared Smith, Layton, Utah
Hey, Jared: If Pryor is not selected in the supplemental draft, he would be considered a free agent, able to sign with any team. A team that really wants him would risk losing him to a higher bidder (signing bonus) if it passed him in the draft.
Hey, Tony: As much as I love Josh Cribbs, don't you think that we are overpaying him for what our team seems to be getting out of him? He's a great character guy, but don't you think we should shop him and get a good trade or draft pick? I don't believe he's a true wide receiver. To me he just seems to be a overpaid returner/want to be receiver. -- Scott Baker, Cuyahoga Falls
Hey, Scott: A much better idea would be to utilize Cribbs in a fashion that makes him an impact player on offense. I think that's what they're trying to do.
Hey, Tony: It is my understanding, thanks to Jerry Jones, that the NFL may unilaterally reduce the season to 18 games from the current 20 (16 league games, four exhibitions). If the players then insisted that the 18 games be two exhibition games and 16 regular-season games, they would only receive 90 percent of their pay. Is that true? If so, wouldn't you think that we can pretty count on an 18-game league schedule if the league exercises its option? -- Steve Davies-Tight, Cleveland
Hey, Steve: The league wisely has abandoned the idea of forcing an 18-game schedule on the players without their consent. The issue will be revisited in 2013 when the next round of TV contracts are negotiated. The league is hoping the amazing amount of new revenue generated by two games will cause the players to buy into the concept.
-- Tony