What lockout? There's always plenty of Browns questions when Tony Grossi opens his reader mailbag.
AP photoOzzie Newsome may want to see Art Modell enshrined in Canton, but Tony Grossi says the former Brown tight end and longtime Ravens GM hasn't pushed the issue with him. Hey, Tony: Ozzie Newsome was recently quoted in the Baltimore Sun that he constantly tells you to get over the move and that Art Modell deserves to be in the Hall of Fame. How do you respond to him in these conversations, as it was not mentioned in the article? -- Brian Carlin, Conshohocken, Pa.
Hey, Brian: Newsome's comments were news to me. We never talk about Modell and the Hall of Fame. I know where he's coming from and he knows where I'm coming from. I think he said what he said because he was speaking to his ticket-buyers and his owner was on the conference call. Everyone should understand why Newsome is loyal to Modell. Unfortunately for Modell, Newsome doesn't have a vote.
Hey, Tony: Jabaal Sheard played exclusively right end at Pitt. The Browns have a glaring hole at right end. Vernon Gholston has been released by the Jets. Do you think the Browns have any interest in him? -- James Gabbert, Wadsworth
Hey, James: Unless something unforeseen happens, Sheard will be the starting right end when the first game is played. Gholston is receiving much love in my mailbag. I don't see a problem with the Browns bringing him in for a tryout at minimum salary, but I don't detect any interest on their part.
Hey, Tony: Do you think the fact that we didn't draft a developmental QB this year is a strong indication that Mike Holmgran and Tom Heckert are probably going to keep Jake Delhomme around? I actually like the idea, because his tutelage of Colt McCoy was instrumental last season. If he stays, do you think they'll ask him to renegotiate his contract? Lastly, what do you make of the fact that in all the news about Camp Colt and the latest mini-camp in Berea this week that there has been no mention of Seneca Wallace? Is there a rift between him and the rest of the team? Did he learn nothing from last season, when he had almost zero chemistry with any of the receivers? -- Jim Jarrell, Lakewood
Hey, Jim: 1. I wouldn't say Delhomme is a lock to be back. The Browns could fill that developmental QB role with an undrafted free agent. 2. If he stays, it would likely be for the NFL minimum. Delhomme took home $7 million from the Browns and $12.25 million from Carolina last year. He's not hurtin'. 3. I wouldn't overreact to Wallace not being at Camp Colt. He knows the offense better than any of them and is held in high esteem by the front office and new coaches. His perceived attitude problem last year was a misperception caused by one honest interview he gave. Having said that, Wallace didn't exactly have confidence in what the coaches were trying to do on offense.
Hey, Tony: Why is the media reporting on free agency? There is no clear indication that there will be any free agency in the near future, so why are there stories based on mere rumors? It seems like a waste of time to me. -- Kyle Chormanski, Los Angeles
Hey, Kyle: To some extent, I agree. But we're all struggling to write about something other than the labor dispute. Plus, most fans want to fantasize about signing players. My guess is free agency will be a big letdown for Browns fans -- if it ever takes place this summer.
Hey, Tony: I am starting to believe the Browns don't need a star WR with the West Coast offense. I am buying that the scheme will make the WR. If a big move is made on offense, I would like to see a big-name RB. Marion Barber did pretty well with an awful O-line. Any big name RBs you see out there? -- Eliot Clasen, Cape Coral, Fla.
Hey, Eliot: I believe the Browns won't sign a receiver in free agency. As for a running back, Barber doesn't fit what they want -- a third-down, change of pace, pass catcher/scatback. Jerome Harrison? Darren Sproles? Brian Westbrook?
John Kuntz / The Plain DealerD'Qwell Jackson is a nominal starter in the Browns' projected linebacking corps in 2011, but his streak of serious chest injuries should force the team to consider other options. Hey, Tony: Do you think the Browns have the linebackers to play the 4-3? If so, who do you envision will start at each position? Do you think the team will look for help in free agency? -- Steve Bohnenkamp, Geneva, Ill.
Hey, Steve: The projected starting linebackers, from left to right, are Scott Fujita, Chris Gocong and D'Qwell Jackson. I believe they need another solid linebacker to compete with Jackson, who has had two major pectoral injuries in two years. His durability is a natural question mark at this point.
Hey, Tony: Do you know why Greg Little did not go to Camp Colt? I hope this is no indication of this guy's motivation. If any one needed to be there, it was him. -- George Cole, Richfield
Hey, George: Little's agent said this week that he had a previous family commitment and that he intended to attend future player-organized workouts but would not take part in workouts on the field to avoid the risk of injury.
Hey, Tony: I often joke that Browns could have saved money on scouts and just bought a magazine at the airport on the way to the draft, and used that as the guide, and had more success than they have had. To my chagrin all of the pre-draft magazines have Phil Taylor, Greg Little and Jabaal Sheard projected as 2-3 round picks. Did the Browns over-reach -- again -- on these guys? Was it really necessary to give up a third-round pick to move up to get Taylor? -- Mike Waller, Alexandria, Va.
Hey, Mike: Most national experts have given high marks to the Browns' draft. I tend to agree with you. My stance on the huge trade down -- and then trade up -- is well documented. I'll give Heckert the benefit of doubt, but it's fair to question some of the things they did.
Hey, Tony: Colt has a playbook -- are there rules against him making copies for the players? -- Steve MacDonald, Tallahassee, Fla.
Hey, Steve: If he hasn't made copies by now, he's not as smart as we thought. Rules, schmules. Any rules during an owners lockout are probably antitrust violations, anyway, so forget them.
Hey, Tony: You have raised the important point that the Browns will lose a lot if there is no draft in 2012, because of the trade with Atlanta. Could the Browns (or any team) have framed the trade to be for the "next draft" and not designate a year? That way should there be no draft in 2012, but possibly in the future, the Browns would not be left high-and-dry. -- Erol Altug, Stony Brook, N.Y.
Hey, Erol: Sorry. The language of the trade explicitly stated the first- and fourth-round picks in 2012. As an NFL official said before the draft on the subject of trading for 2012 picks, "Trade at your own risk."
Hey, Tony: Is it true that the defensive players did not get a playbook when the lockout was [briefly] lifted? What's up with that? I don't think there is a good enough explanation for that, do you? -- Mike Love, Merritt Island, Fla.
Hey, Mike: Defensive coordinator Dick Jauron told me that no defensive players were in town for the 24-hour period the lockout was lifted and none came in for a playbook. A bit of an oversight, I would say, on the players' part.
John Kuntz / PDThere's no reason to be particularly concerned that Pat Shurmur plans to devote extra attention to offense in his first season with the Browns, says Tony Grossi. Hey, Tony: 1. Wouldn't making copies of playbooks be bad? Players that are cut/traded can distribute playbooks to other teams for a competitive advantage. 2. How involved do you see Ray Rhodes being in the defense? 3. I know this is all speculation, but do you expect Pat Shurmur to regret not hiring an offensive coordinator? 4. Shurmur was criticized by St. Louis fans last year for their "vanilla" offense. Should I be worried? -- Browns Fan, Toledo
Hey, Fan: 1. All's fair in times of war, and the owners and player definitely are embroiled in labor war.
2. Rhodes will be very involved in the teaching and planning of the defense. He and Jauron have worked together before.
3. I'm not that hung up about Shurmur not hiring a coordinator. Any offensive-minded head coach wants to put his imprint on his team before delegating his offense to someone else. He'll be fine.
4. The Rams broke in a rookie QB and a rookie left tackle and had no receivers after a few veterans were injured early. Plus, Shurmur was taking orders from a defensive-minded head coach. I think things will be different here.
Hey, Tony: You have said over and over that what you were opposed to was the Browns trading down so far and then trading back up to get Phil Taylor. So that assumes that if you were the GM, you would have tried to trade down a little less, but with a little less of a drop (mid-first round?). Well what if there were no trading partners in the middle of the first round, or even in the high 20s that would be willing to give up as much as the Falcons did. Would you stay put and take a player that you are not enamored with (JJones) or take the only blockbuster deal proposed? The point is, the Falcons may have been the only team willing to give up five draft picks for our #6....In that situation, won't you admit Heckert did the right thing? -- Jeff Kennedy, Duncan Falls
Hey, Jeff: Listen, he's getting high marks for what he did. I've said I was "uneasy" with the trade but getting the No. 1 next year made it "doable." I'll be more excited about the trade next year. But let's hope there is a draft in 2012 and the players don't prevail in making every player coming out of college a free agent. Haven't found anyone who will guarantee the draft will be held.
Hey, Tony: You have said "If there is a draft next year." Assuming there won't be, how will teams acquire players and fairly, how many to each team, etc.?
Have you spoken to Phil Dawson since he was franchised and if so what are his thoughts? Do you get the impression he still wants out and if so is there a way for him to go assuming he wants to?
Last question, with training camp only nine weeks away does your gut tell you a deal will happen at the 11th hour? I cannot believe the owners would be willing to lose all that revenue and their reputation, besides aren't there rules about playing a certain number of games in certain stadiums? Thanks for always doing an outstanding job covering the Browns! -- Jim Cole, Altus, Okla.
Hey, Jim: 1. In the event the draft is abolished through court action, every player coming out of college would be a free agent -- able to negotiate with any team. It would be a free-for-all scramble.
2. Dawson repeatedly has refused to talk about being franchised. It's a safe assumption he is too upset to talk about his situation. He does want out, from what I've been told. He did not sign his franchise tender before the lockout. If he does not sign it when business resumes, he could withhold his services but not jump to another team. If he did that, it would be ugly and I don't see Dawson doing anything ugly.
3. My gut tells me this: a. very likely the season is screwed up; b. probable that games will be canceled, c. increasingly possible the season may not be played at all.
Hey, Tony: You said last week that Philly became an elite team by picking Donovan McNabb as the second pick in 1999. How many Super Bowls did they win? -- Mike B, Dover
Hey, Mike: Zero. So your definition of an elite team is one that wins the Super Bowl? Mine is a team that consistently is in the playoffs with a chance to win the championship just about every year.
Hey, Tony: Who do you consider the leaders of the Browns defense? Why don't you think they got the defensive playbook when they could have? Do you think it is possible they did and it hasn't come out? -- Jim Murphy, Cincinnati
Chuck Crow / The Plain DealerWhether or not he has Dick Jauron's new playbook, Scott Fujita is clearly the leader of the Browns' defense. Hey, Jim: Scott Fujita is a leader on the defense. He didn't fly back to Cleveland when the lockout was temporarily lifted because he knew the lockout would be reinstated 24 hours later. I don't know why some of the other defensive players who may have been in town did not come in to get a playbook.
Hey, Tony: After the first round, I really liked the draft, specifically Little and Cameron. I like the fact that the Browns feel they can develop elite athletes into football players. I think it shows Heckert and Holmgren have confidence in the staff and most importantly are forward thinking in terms of amassing depth at all positions, because as we know, needs change yearly. My million dollar question is, if we keep stockpiling talent and keep planning our drafts the way [title teams] seem to do, how long till The Big Show & Co. actually take us to The Big Show? -- Sean McNabb, Berea
Hey, Sean: I constantly answer this question this way because I believe it -- until the Browns find an elite quarterback, that other stuff is secondary. Is McCoy the elite quarterback? Let's hope so. If not, nose tackles, cornerbacks, tight ends and fullbacks won't matter much. Yes, it actually is that simple. The teams you mentioned have Ben Roethlisberger, Joe Flacco, Michael Vick, Aaron Rodgers and Tom Brady at quarterback. Once you have an elite quarterback -- Flacco is getting there -- the other pieces are so much easier to fit. Doing it bass ackwards isn't the way to get to the Super Bowl. The days of a journeyman like Trent Dilfer going for the ride to the Super Bowl are over.
Hey, Tony: I am very curious to know what the trade with Atlanta would have yielded if players were able to be traded? Any ideas? -- Justin Sack, Phoenix, Ariz.
Hey, Justin: The trade probably would have been the same. If the trade were with Philadelphia, there might have been a player or two Heckert would want. I'm not sure of any Falcons that would have been considered.
Hey, Tony: You said the reason the Eagles are a successful franchise is because they selected Donovan McNabb No. 2 overall in 1999. The Browns selected a quarterback at No. 1 that year and haven't been a successful franchise since then. What's your point? -- Bill Wyszynski, Cleveland
Hey, Bill: Picking a quarterback first or high isn't the point. Picking the right one is. McNabb was clearly the best of the five quarterbacks taken in the first round in 1999. They made the right talent evaluation. The Browns did not.
Hey, Tony: In your [May 14] interview with Dick Jauron you reported: "When the lockout was lifted for about 24 hours before the draft, none of the defensive players showed up at Browns headquarters to receive materials from Jauron and the defensive staff." The coach's response was: "The difficult side for us is they don't have their stuff." What prevented the team from shipping the playbooks within that 24-hour window? -- Dale Galbraith, Barberton
Hey, Dale: I'm not sure anything prevented the Browns from shipping the playbook. I would presume that teams are against doing that for fear of the top-secret playbook getting in the wrong hands.
Hey, Tony: In last week's Hey Tony, you said the following: "Consistently trading out of the top 10 is no more a blueprint for building a team than consistently drafting in the top 10." I would agree with you. But let's remember, last year, Heckert stayed where we were and took Haden. He then traded back up (not down mind you), to get Hardesty. In this year's draft, It seems obvious to me that Heckert wasn't in love with any of the top 10 to 15 guys, except maybe A.J. Green, and it was a very smart move to collect the picks he did. Two firsts next year for this franchise is a great coup. I don't think "consistently" was the right word to use. -- Joshua Jones, Fullerton, Calif.
Hey, Joshua: I realize Heckert was not here for the infamous trade-down in 2009. But that's two trade downs of epic proportions in three years for the same franchise. Football suicide, in my opinion.
Hey, Tony: I just read the column on the Browns' possible pursuit of a free agent wide receiver. Even if they do, don't you think that we are getting overloaded as is? Little, Robiskie, Mitchell, Massaquoi, Cribbs and a free agent on top of them? Who would be the first to go? -- Chris Zanon, Canton
Hey, Chris: Forget about a wide receiver. I was asked if they pursued one in free agency, which would be best. I suggested Vincent Jackson or Sidney Rice. Wasn't advocating they sign one and don't think there's any chance they will, for the very reason you point out.
-- Tony