Would the Indians trade Carlos Santana? Perhaps, but the asking price would be high.
CLEVELAND, Ohio -Do you have a question that you'd like to have answered in Hey, Hoynsie? Submit it here or Tweet him at @hoynsie.
Hey, Hoynsie: Will Carlos Santana be one of the players the Indians try to trade at the deadline? What do you think his trade value is? - John Eckhardt, Rochester, N.Y.
Hey, John: Indians GM Chris Antonetti has been asked about several of his players by other teams. I'm sure Santana has been one of them and that they'd consider trading him in the right deal.
Santana isn't having a good year. He's started to hit lately, but in the first half he was a disappointment.
Still, in a game screaming for offense, he's a 29-year-old switch hitter with a track record of power so his trade value is high. He's also signed through 2016 with a club option for 2017.
That makes him attractive as well.
Hey, Mitch: The last time I checked Baltimore was closer to the postseason than the Indians. I don't know why they'd make that trade.
Hey, Hoynsie: Creative tension between John Hart and Mike Hargrove was one of the reasons for the great run in the 1990s and it was lost when then GM Mark Shapiro fired manager Charlie Manuel. Is there anyone in the current front office/coaching staff that presents an alternative perspective? - Steve Cornelius, Rocky River.
Hey, Steve: Let's not rewrite history. The main reason for the success of the 1990s had to do with guys named Albert Belle, Manny Ramirez, Sandy Alomar, Jim Thome, Omar Vizquel, Carlos Baerga, Jose Mesa, Orel Hershiser, Dennis Martinez etc. Hart and Hargrove didn't always agree, but they certainly were able to put a lot of talent on the field at the same time.
As for Shapiro firing Manuel, you've got it wrong. Manuel fired himself. Creative differences had nothing to do with it. He wanted to know if he'd be back after the 2002 season and Shapiro wasn't ready to tell him. Manuel forced the issue at the All-Star break and lost his job.
Manuel bounced back and won a World Series with the Phillies. He did more than OK.
The current administration does not invite me to their staff meetings. Admittedly, the environment is cozy with manager Terry Francona's contract tied to the employment of GM Chris Antonetti and Shapiro, but I can't believe you can put 10 to 20 baseball people in the same room and not have a difference of opinion over something.
Hey, Sean: Brandon Moss hasn't played third all year. In his career, he's played third twice in the big leagues. I think we have our answer.
Hey, Hoynsie: What is the correlation between the Indians home record and attendance at home games? Obviously, winning will draw more fans, but the Indians have played much better o the road. Is home field advantage only an advantage if you have a crowd to make some noise? -- Dan Glaser, North Royalton.
Hey, Dan: I've always felt it's easier for team to play at home than it is on the road regardless of how many people are in the stands. A player's routine is more stable, you're not living out of a suitcase shuttling back and forth between the ballpark and hotel.
The home and road record of certain teams is always quirky, but there's one thing that isn't. If a team is going to reach the postseason, it has to have a winning record at home.
The Indians went into the weekend with the second worst home record in the AL at 19-26 and second lowest attendance in the big leagues.
Hey, Carl: I've heard at least one Tribe player say the 19-foot wall in left field is one of the problems. But no one has said anything about the revamped right field corner.
It's funny, I never heard Albert Belle, Manny Ramirez or Jim Thome say anything about 19-foot wall.
Hey, Hoynsie: As the Indians reach epic levels of offensive futility is it time to move Jason Kipnis down in the order? He seems to be unfazed by hitting in different spots in the order. The Indians could bring up Tyler Holt, a decent contact guy, to bat second and play center field. - Carl Mizda, Stow.
Hey, Carl: You didn't say who would replace Kipnis in the leadoff spot. I'm guessing you'd probably go with Francisco Lindor. I think there is enough pressure on Lindor already with him hitting No.2.
In his career, Kipnis has spent the most time in the No.3 spot. Does that mean you'd drop Michael Brantley to No.4? You see where I'm going with this? You'd take you're two most productive spots in the lineup and change the players who were hitting there.
I think Kipnis can hit anywhere in the lineup. Brantley has already shown he can. I just don't know if you've got a replacement for Kipnis in the leadoff spot.
Hey, A.J. -- This farm system hasn't produced hitters such as Jim Thome, Albert Belle, Manny Ramirez, Brian Giles and Richie Sexson to be sure. But those teams were also loaded with high-quality free agents.
A team needs to acquire players from all available avenues to win.
Hey, Hoynsie: There is no answer to how the Indians can avoid paying Nick Swisher Swisher $15 million and Michael Bourn $14 million next year, right? Please put into context how bad these free agent signings were in 2013 - Douglas Simek, Concord.
Hey, Douglas: I thought they were good deals when they happened just before the 2013 season. Every big league club was getting a big influx of national TV money in 2014. This was the Indians way of getting a jump on the competition because they knew that with everything being equal in 2014, based on where their payroll started, they weren't going to be able to sign top-shelf free agents.
They were also coming off a 68-94 season in 2012 and had to do something to stir interest.
Swisher and Bourn had been consistent and productive players before they signed with the Indians. Unfortunately, the deals couldn't have turned out worse.
Hey, Bruce: He's hitting .271 (55-for-203) with 14 homers and 43 RBI at Class AAA Columbus. He's had two tours with the Tribe, hitting .375 (9-for-24) with one homer and six RBI.
Sands isn't on the 40-man roster and the Indians would have to maneuver players to bring him back to the big leagues. They could also wait until September when the rosters expand.
Hey, Hoynsie: How much blame does Paul Dolan put on Mark Shapiro and Chris Antonetti for the signing of Michael Bourn and Nick Swisher? I know fans clamored for a big free agent deal, but they couldn't have missed anymore than they did with these two. Even if it means manager Terry Francona leaves with them, isn't it time for a new front office? - Bruce Hrvatin, Richfield.
Hey, Bruce: I'm not sure how much Dolan holds Shapiro and Antonetti accountable. I do know he had to approve both deals. Dolan could certainly make changes in the front office if he wants to, but no matter who is running the baseball operations, the outcome is going to be the same.
A general manager, under this ownership, can turn only so much water into wine before he runs out of miracles. An under-financed team cannot win consistently in the big leagues. Ownership has to have enough money, and enough confidence in the people making the baseball decisions, to move past signings such as Swisher and Bourn and continue to try and improve.
Hey, F.B.: I'm all for it. In fact I'm living in the now right now. Unfortunately, so are the Indians.
Hey, Hoynsie: It is nice to see the starting pitching doing its job to consistently give the Indians a chance to win. Unfortunately, the Indians cannot come from behind with pitching. Do you see them dealing one of their five starters in order to get a big bat in return? - Shawn Marshall, Garfield Heights.
Hey, Shawn: There's a demand for starting pitching as the July 31st deadline approaches. The Indians have good starting pitching that is under control so they've been talking to a lot of teams.
That being said, I don't see them trading any of their top five starters.
Hey, Woodrow: I think improving the offense will be a priority at the July and August deadlines and the offseason.
Hey, Hoynsie: Please explain international player signing slots and why players are traded to obtain these positions? - Ford Behm, Geneva.
Hey, Ford: This is MLB's way of trying to regulate spending on the international market because there is no international draft. The signing season for international free agents began on July 2.
Each team receives a signing bonus pool based on the reverse order of their winning percentage from the past season. This year Arizona received the largest signing bonus pool at $5,393,900.
The pool size is based on $700,000 for each team and four slot values. The Indians bonus pool, according to Baseball America, is $2,204,900 with slot values of $641, 300, $409,500, $276,400 and $177,700.
A team can trade for up to 50 percent of their signing bonus pool. The Indians, however, just couldn't trade for 50 percent of their $2,204,900 bonus pool. They'd have to do it at the specific slot values listed for other teams.
Last month the Blue Jays acquired slot values from the Dodgers to help pay for international free agent Vladimir Guerrro Jr. The Blue Jays sent the Dodgers two players in exchange.