The emergence of Carlos Santana has the Indians pondering if it makes sense to send Lonnie Chisenhall to the minors.
GOODYEAR, Arizona -- Talking to myself about what the Indians should do at third base?
Question: Will Carlos Santana be the every day third baseman?
Answer: Yes … no … maybe.
Q: What kind of answer is that?
A: Let's start with what Santana has accomplished. As Manager Terry Francona said Sunday morning: "He looks like a third baseman. He has earned our trust."
Q: Doesn't that sound like he is the third baseman?
A: Francona did add, "It's always different when the bell rings," meaning when the regular season opens. He added, "You can't make them hit balls to third."
Terry Francona says that Carlos Santana has "earned trust" for how he has played third this spring.Chuck Crow / The Plain Dealer Q: Meaning what?
A: I've watched Santana play parts of five games at third this spring -- and maybe he's had five grounders hit to him. It's so hard to judge, other than he appears comfortable and confident. But he hasn't been tested.
Q: Will he open the season at third base?
A: That's my guess. He will play there at least a few times a week.
Q: So what about Lonnie Chisenhall?
A: That's the question the Indians are discussing.
Q: Would they send him to the minors?
A: They could, he does have a minor league option left.
Q: Then who would play third when Santana catches, plays first or is the DH?
A: Mike Aviles started 37 games at third last season. He made three errors. Aviles is batting .351 (.906 OPS) this spring. He's a career .273 batter in six big league seasons. He can play anywhere in the infield or outfield. That same versatility is true of Elliot Johnson, who has made the team as Aviles-type bench player. While Johnson is a switch-hitter, he's also a career .218 hitter.
Mike Aviles also is a possibility at third base.Chuck Crow / The Plain Dealer Q: So when Santana doesn't play third, the Tribe would probably use Aviles?
A: Unless they keep Chisenhall.
Q: Should he make the team?
A: At this point in his career, I'd open the season with Chisenhall in the majors. Yes, you can send him back to Class AAA. But he has been in Columbus enough times in the last four years to run for mayor. He batted .390 (1.132 OPS) with six homers and 26 RBI in 125 plate appearances for the Clippers last season.
Q: What kind of spring has it been for Chisenhall?
A: Here is what Francona said a few days ago: "It was a little bit different situation. Lonnie came in last year and he knew he was going to be the third baseman. This year, we have Carlos over there and we don't quite know yet what we're going to do. So what we've asked Lonnie to do is play the best he can and let us worry about the decisions. I think he's done a good job of that."
Q: What does that mean?
A: Who really knows? On Saturday, he mentioned that it made no sense for Chisenhall to be on the roster if plays only once or twice a week.
Q: What do you think?
A: Chisenhall is batting .289 (.855 OPS) this spring with four extra base hits, including a homer and seven RBI in 52 plate appearances. He still looks bad against lefties. He has been up and down at third base, charged with two errors. He definitely is feeling the pressure to make the team.
Q: Wasn't he good last spring?
A: Chisenhall was Mr. Goodyear at this time last year. The Indians gave third base to him, and he produced to hit .400 (24-of-60) with four homers, 12 RBI and a 1.123 OPS. He had only one error in 120 innings.
Q: Then what happened?
A: By May 12, he was sent to minors, batting .213 at the time. He pounded the ball in Columbus. He came to Cleveland and never really grabbed the job. He finished the season hitting .225 (.668 OPS) with 11 homers and 36 RBI in 289 at bats for the Tribe.
Q: Why does he hit so well in spring training and the minors, but not with the Tribe?
A: Chisenhall tends to look for fastballs, and he can really crush a mediocre to even slightly better than average fastball. He doesn't walk much, only 32 in 643 official big league at bats. But in the league, the lefty batter sees a lot of off-speed stuff. Because he's anxious at home plate, he tends not to work the count in his favor. And that tends to lead to fewer fastballs for him to hit.
Q: Will he improve?
A: That's what the Indians are wondering. The glitter is gone from him being the team's 2008 first-round draft choice. Last season was his third attempt to stick in Cleveland, and it was his worst year of the three.
Q: Do you write him off?
A: At the age of 25? I don't. They can open the season with him playing 3-4 times a week against right-handers. Santana can play third the rest of the time. Santana is not going play third every day, because Francona likes him also as a catcher a few times each week.
Q: I don't quite follow your point…
A: Would you rather see Chisenhall receive another shot at third base 3-4 times a week, or would you prefer to have Aviles or Johnson in the lineup instead on those days? Forget it against lefties. Chisenhall is a .194 career big league hitter against them. Facing righties, he's .256 (.714 OPS). He also struggles some seasons in the minors against lefties.
Q: You're supposed to be answering the questions, not me.
A: Finding the answer often means framing the right question.
Q: Meaning what?
A: It's worth giving Chisenhall another chance to prove he's more than a good Class AAA player, because the alternatives at third (Aviles and Johnson) are not that attractive. If Chisenhall fails, he can sent to the minors again. But for now, I'm ready for one more round with him at third.
Q: What do you think the Tribe will do?
A: Aviles play some third base season when Chisenhall falters. Johnson already has been told he's on the roster. Santana has earned "trust" at third, it appears Chisenhall may be saying hello to Columbus one more time.